Who is better, Shao Weihua or Qin?

Let me compare you.

Qin writes well, arranges and lists in an orderly way, and introduces all aspects of knowledge in a comprehensive way, but he writes books like a scholar behind closed doors, unlike a person who often shows people around the house. The content is basically the actual operation of regulating qi, which rarely shows that his actual operation level is in doubt, and he may not get a real biography of Feng Shui. He is just a theoretical researcher.

Needless to say, Shao Weihua, the first person to become famous in actual combat after becoming famous, has attracted the attention of all walks of life, promoted the popularization of Yi-ology and attracted many young people to study. However, Shao's scope is not much, his knowledge is narrow, and he has no theoretical achievements to write about, especially professional examples. The logic is unclear. This is a question of cultural foundation and thinking. The level of Yi-ology is superficial. Without a very proficient category, the level of eight characters is inaccurate.

Neither of them is a liar. Qin's theoretical level is still good.