Straw burning can reduce the use of pesticides and reduce the pollution of pesticides to water sources, right?

On the earth, the number of vegetation can be said to account for a large proportion. Whether in life or in production, the dependence on the "trunk" of vegetation can be said to be very high. However, in order to protect the ecological environment, we also advocate reducing the damage to vegetation, so that our climate conditions and ecosystem will be more stable. Of course, from a scientific point of view, this does make sense. The most important thing is that everyone should protect the ecological environment.

While protecting the ecological environment, we also encounter some problems, that is, without destroying the ecological environment, it may also bring some environmental things that may have an impact on the earth, such as "straw", which is too common for us and can be seen everywhere in rural areas. Straw is just a general term for stems and leaves (spikes) of mature crops. Friends who work in the countryside should always see the existence of "straw". Usually when crops are ripe, we will leave "straw" when harvesting. Therefore, it includes the backbone of wheat, rice, corn and other crops, and straw, as the backbone of food crops, certainly plays an important role. In the process of growing up, if there is no backbone, there is basically no way out.

Therefore, "trunk" is the basis of crop survival. Generally speaking, during the growth of crops, some animals may eat it because these "trunks" contain nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium and organic matter, some of which are suitable for the growth of wild animals. But many times, for the growth of crops, human beings will drive away wild animals to ensure the last food, so they finally produce a lot of "straw", all of which are very good. The carbon dioxide pollutant released by straw burning is the biggest "greenhouse gas". If human beings burn straw every year, it will lead to more serious air pollution and accelerate the global greenhouse effect, so it will lead to more extreme climate phenomena. In fact, it also affects our future crop growth from the side. If the climate changes, the growth of crops will also be hindered, and finally the food problem will be the same.

In many places, farmers' stoves are no longer allowed to smoke, and many farms have closed down because of environmental pollution. Without animal manure and human manure, high-temperature compost can't pile up. And many rural areas don't allow dung piles to exist. The straw house is long gone, and the straw has changed from the original baby to garbage. "In recent years, pests and diseases have become more and more serious, which has a lot to do with returning straw to the field. After returning the stalks with pests and diseases to the field, there are more and more pests and diseases in the soil, and many drugs can't cure them every year. If the quality of straw returning to the field is poor, it will also lead to poor seedling emergence, weak growth and even dead seedlings! " A farmer talked about the distress of returning straw to the field, and there was helplessness in his words. The state attaches great importance to grain production, and farmers know the importance of growing grain. However, the treatment of straw in summer and autumn every year is a headache for farmers. If we attach importance to grain production, we must solve the problem of straw treatment. Banning burning is not a long-term solution, nor is it the only way. Only by finding the real way out of straw can we solve the problem of banning burning. If you can't find an ideal solution at the moment, can you change the ban on burning to limit burning?