Is luck really good or bad?

In order to prove the existence of fate, I paid special attention to a middle-aged tramp who had lived under an overpass for more than ten years. Every time I go out, I pass by that place, and every time I see that man sitting on the floor reading books and newspapers, walking frequently, with sound limbs and strong body. From this, I think: if he can read books and newspapers and has sound limbs, then this person is undoubtedly a normal person, but why doesn't he live a decent life like a normal person? Even doing odd jobs is much more respectable than living under a bridge. But why doesn't he-even a fool will choose to do odd jobs. He chose to live his own life in isolation. I have a headache, and finally I can only conclude that in his subconscious, the world is not with him, and he can only choose this kind of life. At this time, if someone invites him, it may change his status quo. On the other hand, if he was born in a rich family since childhood, it would never be like this. I think the existence of fate makes sense. Think again: If Liu Bei hadn't invited him out of the mountain, Zhuge Liang would still be a village man. Further analysis, as a normal person, Zhuge Liang must know that with his talent and knowledge, he should have taken the initiative to travel outside long ago, but why did he choose to live alone in the mountains? This also shows that his subconscious is isolated from the world and he likes this kind of life. Fortunately, Liu Bei found out, and he also cared about Mao Lu. He also reluctantly went down the mountain, which is more mysterious. As a normal person, he has already traveled by himself, but he just likes to live in seclusion in the mountains. This can only be said that fate implanted a special instruction in his subconscious, and the tie made him carry out this instruction. For another example, a person who never gambles unexpectedly went to Las Vegas one day and lost everything. This is definitely not his intention. Destiny must have given him special instructions to gamble. These examples further confirm the existence of fate. For another example, both the rich and the poor are luckier than the poor. It must be that the rich are luckier than the poor. Because the rich man has too much money, every aspect of his life is in the most advanced, comfortable and safe place. Bodyguards escort him out by car, eat the best food and live in the safest and most luxurious villa. It can be said that as long as there is no car accident, there is basically no external factor to create bad luck. The poor are completely different. In order to survive, the poor are all in the lowest environment, doing construction, running takeout and mining. It can be said that the bad luck of the poor will come at any time. From this perspective, the quality of luck is also related to superior conditions. For another example, two people apply for the same position in a company at the same time, but the company only needs one person and two people with similar education, knowledge and experience, but the company's appearance is better. Because I know some people say that everyone will have some setbacks, big and small. It seems that the good luck and bad luck of the poor and the rich are the same. In my opinion, compared with the poor, there are 90% advantages and 10% advantages. It must be that the rich have only 10% chance of bad luck, while the poor have 90% chance of good luck. There is also a limited number of cakes. Those with more advantages must eat cakes, while those with less advantages may not. Or eat less than others, and good things are reserved for those who are prepared, so people with poor conditions are not lucky. Why do people always go smoothly and reach the peak in a few steps? That's because that person has too many advantages. Why do some personnel matters hit a wall everywhere, and even get worse? The reason is that he follows a group of people who are all better than him. How can he be tactful? If even he has reached the peak, no one in the world will be rich or poor.