Let’s talk about Chery first.
Despite Chery’s poor sales in recent years, Chery’s technology was indeed the best among domestic OEMs in the early years. In the automotive industry, Chery's technology was recognized as No. 1 in the early years. It was known as the Whampoa Military Academy of the automotive industry. Many OEMs that later developed, such as Geely and Great Wall, many of their middle and senior R&D leaders came from Chery. . Why, because Chery was one of the first companies to engage in the automobile industry and focused on talent cultivation. In the early days, it sent several batches of potential talents to study at Daimler or Ford in the United States. After returning, they all became the backbone of domestic R&D. Another point is that Chery focuses on basic research and development and technology accumulation. It has always been a domestic leader in performance research directions such as NVH and CAE analysis. It's just that Chery didn't pay attention to styling design in its early years. The cars it produced were all well-received but not popular, and it lost its position as the domestic sales leader.
Let’s talk about auspiciousness.
Geely has indeed prospered in the past two years. After acquiring Volvo, it has fully absorbed and transformed Volvo's open technology. Chairman Li Shufu’s strategy is to achieve overtaking in corners through the acquisition of digestion and absorption technology. This trick has really worked. Geely's technology has advanced by leaps and bounds in the past two years. On the one hand, it benefits from its willingness to pay high prices to hire industry experts, and on the other hand, it also benefits from the absorption of technology. From the current point of view, Geely's technology should be the most average among domestic OEMs, with no shortcomings. Its R&D center's software and hardware investment is the largest and most advanced in China, including joint ventures, including its own collision laboratory every day Collide with at least one vehicle to verify its safety. Wang Ruiping, vice president of power system, is a well-known international powertrain expert. If the shortcomings are not addressed, Geely's technology will be improved as a whole. This can be felt personally from the overall market feedback evaluation of the vehicles currently put on the market by Geely.
Let’s talk about BYD again.
As we all know, BYD’s core advantage lies in the field of electric new energy. In fact, BYD Group's overall strategy is being adjusted. They are currently focusing their resources on the battery field, electric buses, and cloud rail transportation. Therefore, their resources in the automotive field have naturally decreased. We can see that BYD's current sales are basically in the hundreds or thousands, and they are mainly new energy vehicles. This is inseparable from BYD's overall strategic transformation. BYD recruits a large number of fresh graduates every year. In terms of overall technology, BYD is no better than Chery or Geely. But in terms of new energy, since Wang Chuanfu himself is a battery expert, his technical accumulation in this area is still second to none in the country. Even though Geely has been in the industry for the past two years. Although it has increased investment in the new energy field in 2018, its technical capabilities are still inferior to BYD.
Finally, let’s talk about Chang’an.
Changan has actually been walking on two legs since very early. The development of SUVs and sedans is very even. This is why Changan dominated the TOP Sale last year before Geely had such a rapid sales growth this year. . Because Changan is average, it doesn't make a particularly deep impression on people technically. When interviewing their engineers, I can only feel that they still have some technical accumulation. After all, they have a joint venture with Ford, but I always feel that there is something missing. Here is a good comparison Friends from Chang'an who have in-depth knowledge can also tell us.
PS. Why doesn’t the questioner talk about the Great Wall? In fact, I think the Great Wall is quite interesting.
The technological advancement ranking of "domestic automobiles - five major brands" is roughly as follows
Brand ranking:
The ranking of the technical level of domestic automobiles should be like this. Of course, this is a result-oriented evaluation; Among them, the more controversial one is "Chery Automobile". From a technical perspective, this is a somewhat process-oriented company. Why do you say that?
Chery Automobile was founded in 1997. It is a company with some experience among independent brands. However, as a car company in the early days, it did not have the qualification to produce complete vehicles. The first batch of vehicles was Wuhu Bus. Registered and sold in the catalog, the result is that it can only be used as a commercial vehicle (taxi); this is obviously unviable for car companies, and if they want to obtain production qualifications, they must form joint ventures with other car manufacturers. SAIC became Chery goal.
However, SAIC Group has had a joint venture with Volkswagen Group since 1984, and later had in-depth cooperation with General Motors. Chery was naturally not interested, but in the end it accepted the deal under the coordination of the Economic and Trade Commission. This newbie. So Chery transferred 350 million shares to SAIC Motor for free. At this stage, Chery Automobile was called "SAIC Chery".
However, SAIC is not optimistic about Chery's future, so it has put forward the "Four Nos": no investment, no dividends, no management, no responsibility, and it just gives Chery It’s just a car production qualification. It can be seen that Chery Automobile was not popular in the early days, so the "desire for survival" of this car company was naturally very strong. As a result, it did some things that were very embarrassing to SAIC, that is, a large number of copycat cars.
Chery Automobile’s early well-known models were all copycat cars, but it cannot be denied that this is the most ideal low-cost way to start. This is how most Chinese and foreign car companies started. , for example, none of the brands reviewed in this article are exceptions. It’s just that Chery’s copycat prototype is rather embarrassing. The models are as follows.
These prototype cars are mainly from SAIC’s joint venture brands, which means that Chery is more or less poaching others; in the end, it caused a lawsuit from Volkswagen and General Motors, and SAIC once shouldered a total of 30 million marks. The price of compensation was, of course, kicked out by SAIC. Fortunately, Chery already has production qualifications at this time, but Chery seems to have developed this bad habit.
Sub-brand is the key word of Chery Automobile. In recent years, the company has created brands such as Ruiqi, Weilin, Karry, Qoros, Kaiyi, Jietu and Xingtu; among them, in addition to the early "Rui· Lin" disappeared naturally due to low sales, Karry's condition is already very bad, the remaining Qoros was acquired by Baoneng, Kaiyi was effectively controlled by Yibin Wuliangye, Jietu's sales were acceptable, and Xingtu's sluggish sales are likely to be repeated by Qoros taste, but Chery Automobile still enjoys it.
This may be because in the early days, its production qualifications were restricted by SAIC, and breaking up with SAIC did not seem so "piu bright"; so Chery was "obsessed" in inflating its production qualifications. In terms of technology research and development, it is really seriously exaggerated.
Refer to what Chery calls the self-developed 4T15B-1.5T multi-point EFI engine. This engine used to be pretty good. In the early days of my personal use of Tiggo, I really hoped to replace it with the 1.6L-DVVT. machine; however, as far as the matter is concerned, this machine is not truly independently developed, because the technology comes from AVL Lister, a world-renowned company that provides internal combustion engine solutions and production equipment. The supercharger is Honeywell, and the electronic control Coming from United Electronics, this was once a selling point.
The gearbox is the same as Geely’s early start. Even the acquired companies are the same model. The team acquired was the Australian DSI gearbox company; the products built later Including 4AT and continuously variable transmission, these are obviously low-end models. At this point, Chery will no longer have excellent products for a long time.
The direct injection 1.6T launched in the past two years is not bad, the net power of 136.5kw (not the maximum power) is quite satisfactory, and the level of 290N·m (2000~4000rpm) It’s not bad, because the domestic 1.5T engine already has stronger options; and among the 1.6T models, there are two higher-level models, such as the unpopular brand Haima and PSA high-power 1.6T. Regardless of the parameters of these two machines, The actual performance is stronger.
But it cannot be denied that Chery’s 1.6T is adequate for compact SUVs and mid-sized cars. However, Chery does not have a gearbox suitable for vehicles with a class of over 100,000 yuan; the only choice is to face The actual performance of the Getrag 7-speed wet dual-clutch of the second- and third-rate brands generally results in the actual performance of mass-produced cars being less than ideal based on the optimization level. This is Chery Automobile's technical reserve.
The point is that there is no mass-produced direct-injection 2.0T engine so far. Using a small displacement 1.6T to compete with the competing 2.0T engine is undoubtedly overestimating its capabilities; therefore, Chery Automobile’s character design It is very unstable. The characteristic of this brand is that there are many users of the first car, and there are often relatively few users of replacement cars.
Top Four in Fuel Power
1: Haval 4B15B-1.5T direct injection supercharger, power reserve 124kw/285N·m (1400~3000rpm), with valve lift continuously variable The technology is adjusted and equipped on an SUV of nearly 1.7 tons, and its performance is no less than that of Tiggo 7/8; this is the technical advantage. You must know that as a medium-sized car, Tiggo 8 is only a little more than 1.5 tons. It has a leading thrust-to-weight ratio without a performance advantage. Very embarrassing.
The power reserve of the 4C20B-2.0T engine is 165kw/385N·m (1800~3600rpm). How good is this machine? You can experience the F7x four-wheel drive version that breaks 100 kilometers in 6.6 seconds, and the bulky H9 A hard-core SUV; or the BAIC BJ40PLUS can also be tested. As an OEM, Great Wall Motors' products can be accepted by competing car companies. This is its strength.
(The gearbox has a DCT450 seven-speed wet dual-clutch, the overall level is on the upper side, and the quality performance has been confirmed by the H/F and WEY brands)
2: Changan Automobile’s excellent model is not the large-displacement direct-injection 2.0T, because its actual performance is not very ideal, but at least it is there; the brand’s best engine is a product built on the NE platform, such as JL473ZQ3/5, this platform not only has the ability of independent research and development and production, but also can OEM.
Refer to 473ZQ5-1.5T. The power reserve of this machine is 132kw/300N·m (1250~3500rpm); the reason why Chery 1.6T lagged behind not long after it was launched is that these machines will be behind the curve in 2020. are constantly being introduced. In addition, Changan Automobile also has a self-developed 7-speed wet dual-clutch, and the overall performance is smooth. At the same time, there is also a 6AT automatic manual developed by Dongan, and the overall technical reserve and level are obviously higher.
3: Geely Automobile's technical reserves are also relatively "biased". For example, the main excellent model in reverse research and development is "4G18TD-1.8T". This displacement standard is different from 1.6 T is equally strange; both have high consumption tax standards and have been eliminated by other car companies. But fortunately, the price of vehicles equipped with this machine is low enough, so the product is still somewhat cost-effective. This is how it ranks in the SUV camp. Second only to the foundation of Harvard and Changan.
At the same time, Geely Auto also shares internal combustion engine technology with Volvo. The DriveE series 2.0T-T5 engine is of excellent quality; in terms of gearboxes, it has a jointly developed 7-speed wet dual-clutch and DSI's 6AT The manual-automatic technology reserves and continued learning from the establishment of a joint venture factory with Aisin are limitless in the future.
"New energy vehicles" are obviously only worthy of discussion by BYD. Independent research and development of motors may not be a big deal. After all, Chery "independently" develops motors through a joint venture with Japan's Yaskawa, but it does not know that excellent Electric drive systems are mainly produced in mainland China; however, this is the only company that can independently develop power batteries and bring NCM & LFP to the top level in the industry.
BYD is the only car company to break the monopoly on IGBT power semiconductors in electronic control systems. At the same time, BYD has also developed 28-nanometer CPUs and higher-standard technical reserves. This is not an ordinary car. The topic of enterprise.
In terms of internal combustion engines, BYD is no longer weak. The SnapCloud Miller cycle 1.5T power reserve is as high as 136kw/288N·m (1500~3700rpm). The actual performance and cycle The results of the method match; the new high-power 2.0T of the DMi platform has a thermal efficiency of 43, which is also the peak level of domestic engines.
Therefore, BYD Auto is definitely the leading standard in terms of technology. The current problem is that the product planning and marketing of the passenger car segment are relatively poor; but in the fields of commercial vehicles, rail transit, materials science, and military industry As well as the IT field, it has a very high level. This is an immeasurable company.
Finally, let’s finish with the company’s market value:
Chery Automobile has not been listed, but it also has plans to go public after increasing capital and shares. The current major shareholders They are Qingdao Wudaokou, Wuhu Construction Investment Company, etc.; based on the analysis of Wudaokou's shareholding ratio and investment amount, Chery's market value should be less than 23 billion.
Authorized release by Tianhe MCN
According to my ranking, at this stage, in terms of gasoline, Changan GT; Chery GT; BYD GT; Geely, new energy, BYD gt; Geely gt; Chery gt; Changan. Geely: A potential stock sitting on a treasure
I think Geely has the greatest potential, but it is only potential. However, at this stage, the technology accumulation of the three major items is not as good as the other three. an opponent. Geely is sitting on the technological treasure trove of Volvo and Lotus Automobiles. It is like a treasure hunter who has found a pile of treasures and is moving them out again and again. In addition, it is already 2019, and some people still question whether Geely can introduce Volvo's technology. Geely only acquired Volvo's passenger car business (car SUV business). This part of the business 100% belongs to Geely. The technology of the wholly-owned company cannot be introduced? The Geely-Volvo joint R&D center, CMA platform, Lynk & Co, and Geely Xingyue all reflect Geely's absorption of Volvo's technology. Otherwise, if Geely can build a car like Lynk & Co, can the Xingyue use Volvo's T5 engine? Not only Volvo, Lotus' technology will also become Geely's strategic reserve.
However, I cannot give a high score to Geely’s current technical level. Just take the engine to illustrate the problem. In the past, Geely King Kong directly used Toyota's 8A engine. Later, Boyue and others adopted the 1.8T engine developed by reverse engineering EA888. The 1.4T engine developed a while ago is still far behind the top domestic level. , we can’t get any engines with slightly larger displacements, so we can only use Volvo engines. As for the chassis, I won’t talk about it, so I’ll understand. Chery: A steady and powerful player
Just when everyone was questioning Chery's technology, Chery's latest 1.6T turned out to dispel people's doubts.
This third-generation ACTECO 1.6TGDI engine is completely comparable to the joint venture brand in terms of strength. Its parameters are 145kw (190PS) and 290 Nm. In terms of parameters, it is far superior to engines of the same displacement and even comparable to the 1.8T engine. The engine has an exclusive IHEC combustion system that uses a straight-cylinder high tumble intake, optimized combustion chamber, high-pressure direct injection system and high-energy ignition system, which can effectively improve combustion adequacy. The thermal efficiency of 37.1 and the first independent direct injection engine that meets the National VI emission regulations are enough to prove Chery’s strength.
In terms of chassis, Chery is one of the few companies with positive R&D capabilities. Arrizo 7 is the product of Chery’s iAUTO platform, and the new TX model was born from Chery’s new The M3X platform, this alone is already at the forefront of independent brands. Chery loses points because its engine product line is not as complete as Changan's, and the 2.0T is still in the research and development stage. Changan: An undervalued blue chip stock
When people mention the three major domestic automobiles, they always think of Chery first, but selectively ignore Changan Automobile. In fact, Changan Automobile’s The technical strength is very strong. Changan Automobile has formed a global R&D system of "five countries and seven locations, each with its own focus" in Chongqing, Shanghai, and Beijing in China, Turin in Italy, Yokohama in Japan, Nottingham in the United Kingdom, and Detroit in the United States. In terms of chassis, Changan has P3 and P4 platforms. The P3 platform mainly targets small and compact models, as well as high-end mid-size sedans and mid-size SUVs under development; the P4 platform includes high-end medium and large sedans and SUVs. And in terms of chassis tuning, the Changan brand ranks at the forefront of independent brands, and the thickness and support of the chassis are not inferior to joint venture models of the same level.
In terms of engines, Changan Blue Whale series engines cover three gasoline engines: 1.4T, 1.5T, and 2.0T. Among them, the 1.4T has a maximum power of 116kW and a maximum torque of 260N·m. 1.5T has a maximum power of 131KW, a maximum horsepower of 178Ps, and a maximum torque of 265N.m. BYD: a top student who loves to study
In the field of new energy, BYD is The well-deserved number one among the four can be seen from the recent news that Toyota will cooperate with BYD and use BYD's batteries. Let’s focus on the field of fuel vehicles. There was news a while ago that BYD’s DM4.0-2.0T engine has successfully ignited and its thermal efficiency can be as high as 38. However, when we measure the technical level of a car company, we only measure the technology that has been mass-produced. . BYD currently has mainstream 1.2T, 1.5T, and 2.0T engines, which can only be said to be at the mainstream level at present. The most popular 2.0T engine codenamed BYD487ZQA is used in its models. It uses an aluminum alloy cylinder head and cylinder block. It has a maximum power of 151 kilowatts, a maximum torque of 320 Nm, and a maximum torque speed of 1750-4500 rpm. The data level can only be said to be average. It can be seen that BYD Focus more on hybrid vehicles.
This is my ranking of the technical strength of these four independent brands. What do you think?
These four brands should be the top four independent brands. There shouldn’t be many objections, right? Some people talk about the Great Wall, saying that from a technical perspective, the Great Wall is really not qualified to stand with these four. It’s time for Great Wall to catch up with the good times, and a Haval H6 will dominate the world. It looks good, has a lot of space, and is equipped with high configurations. There are no major problems with the three major components, and it’s okay to have high fuel consumption. Whether it's Great Wall or Haval, they don't have any strong technological foundations, so they just rest on their laurels. It's a good achievement to be able to keep it.
First place, BYD.
Just look at the recent stock price and you will know that BYD is very popular! The rise of stocks can reflect market expectations.
BYD has become the first A-share car company with a market value of more than 500 billion yuan, ranking fourth among global car manufacturers in terms of market value, surpassing Mercedes-Benz, Honda, and General Motors, and second only to Volkswagen, which ranks third.
You know, BYD’s sales can’t keep up with Geely Changan. Why is the market value so high and the stock soaring? The capital market looks to the future. And why is BYD valued? technology!
Quoting Xie Lingyun's self-proclaimed saying: There is only one stone in the world, Cao Zijian has eight buckets, I have one bucket, and all the people in the world have one bucket. Switching to the automotive field, it can be said that the technology of state-owned brands is worth one stone, BYD alone has eight buckets, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Hongqi have one bucket, and the rest combined cannot make up one bucket.
Because it is made in China, and because it has a very low name, we ignore its technological "revolutionary innovation". Let me give you an example: Mercedes-Benz has launched a 2.0T engine, which can accelerate to 100 kilometers in 5 seconds and consume only 2 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers. Can this technology cause a revolution in the automotive industry? Is it one step ahead of other car companies? era?
In the past, plug-in hybrids were only available to BYD, but now, from the luxury brand BBA Porsche, to the common joint venture Toyota Volkswagen, to the domestically produced Roewe Geely, all have A plug-in hybrid model was launched. Why? This is the market trend, this is the trend. This is a signal of change in the industry. BYD has already come to the front.
Just like Mercedes-Benz, which established a joint venture with BYD to create Denza, Denza X is just a different shell of Tang DM. The same is true for Toyota. It announced that it will build a joint venture with BYD to develop pure electric vehicles. The new cars will bear the Toyota logo.
Excuse me, what do Mercedes-Benz and Toyota value when they seek a joint venture with BYD? Brand? Capital? It’s not, it’s technology!
We, FAW, Dongfeng, GAC, BAIC and other state-owned enterprises have joint ventures with Toyota, Mercedes-Benz, Honda and other car companies. We are exchanging the market for technology. Now because of our domestically produced technology, people have taken the initiative to come to us. No one would object to ranking BYD first, right? Second place, Chery
I feel that Chery is like a science and engineering man who is obsessed with research and development. He is not good at marketing and only focuses on high technology.
Chery should be the first domestic car company to engage in forward research and development. Do you know what reverse research and development is? To put it simply, it is to dismantle other people's engines and then imitate them. Because the assembly process was backward and there was no core technology, domestically produced cars were really not good at that time. The forward research and development is to design engines by itself. Recently, Chery has launched two new Chinese-core engines with thermal efficiency of 37.1, which represent the top level of domestic engines. However, they have independent property rights but no independent intellectual property rights. Austrians helped develop them. Including chassis tuning and assembly technology, Chery's car manufacturing is already on par with joint ventures. If it weren't for the poor matching of gearbox and engine tuning, the power and fuel consumption performance would be even higher. Personally, I think Chery is currently the best domestic brand for fuel vehicles.
Its Tiggo 8P and Jietu (guaranteed for ten years) both have excellent product capabilities.
Third place: Changan
Changan’s Blue Whale power system, like Chery’s Chinese core, has independent property rights and no independent intellectual property rights. The British helped to make it. Let's compare it with others. Compared with the old Mitsubishi, it is much better, but it is still a bit worse than Chery's Chinese core. The most disgusting thing is the false power standard. The power is not much stronger and the fuel consumption is not low, which greatly reduces my impression of it. However, Changan's workmanship materials and assembly technology are still good. As a state-owned enterprise, it was stunned that Ford, a joint venture, was defeated. It did not rely on joint ventures, but its own independent brands were prosperous, which is indeed unique.
What I can’t forgive is the issue of false marking. Isn’t this deceiving consumers?
Fourth place, Geely
To be honest, Geely’s technology accumulation is actually not very good. It acquired Volvo’s car business, not its technology. Geely acquired Volvo from Ford. Is it possible for Geely to give you engine technology and platform technology for US$1.8 billion? It's a bit of a push to pull the flag. Best-selling models such as the Emgrand and Boyue have nothing to do with technology directly and mostly rely on marketing. From the perspective of assembly technology, there have been great improvements in recent years, including NVH, and we have learned a lot from Volvo. But the power is weak, the fuel consumption is high, and there is nothing particularly outstanding about it. What kind of technical content do you think Emgrand has? What technical content does Boyue have? Can only go for one with good quality and low price.
However, its Lynk & Co sub-brand is still very competitive and qualified to compete with joint venture cars. I have no idea about cars, please follow me and let’s chat about cars!
The most technologically advanced company in the field of traditional fuel vehicles should still be Chery. Although its sales performance has been poor in recent years, its technical reserves and strength are still there. For example, the T1X platform first launched by an independent brand, a 1.5T engine with a thermal efficiency of 37, and a 1.6T in-cylinder direct injection engine with a thermal efficiency of 40 will be installed next. Moreover, it is one of the few companies that has made great achievements in its own brand in the field of gearboxes.
There is no doubt that BYD is the most technologically advanced company in the field of new energy. Although the world is now dominated by fuel vehicles, the big trend in the future is definitely new energy, so BYD is the first to get a ticket to the future car market, so this technical reserve will definitely add a lot of points to BYD.
As for Geely, although it has been tied to Volvo for publicity before. However, before the emergence of Lynk & Co, Volvo did not provide substantial technical support to Geely. At most, it helped Geely in soft power such as concept, management and safety. Therefore, Geely is basically still improving on the original technical level. However, with the launch of Lynk & Co's CMA platform and the latest BMA platform, Geely's technological breakthroughs should become faster and faster. But all this still takes time.
As for Changan, it has always had a low presence among independent brands. Although sales have been high, it is not a company that is good at technology. Of course, there is no denying the impressive strength of its Blue Whale 2.0T engine. But overall, there is no outstanding technical field on its own. It's relatively average, with no obvious weaknesses or obvious strengths.
Based on the above analysis, my point of view is that in the short term, the ranking of technological advancement is Chery GT; BYD GT; Geely GT; Changan, and the long-term ranking should be BYD gt; Geely gt; Chery gt; Changan.
If you don’t move forward, you will retreat. Five years ago, maybe Chery could talk about technological leadership, but five years later, it can no longer be talked about? In terms of platforms, engines, and gearboxes, Geely has completed a matrix layout of 1.0T, 1.3T, 1.4T, 1.5T, 1.8T, and 2.0T! The transmissions include 6-speed dry dual-clutch, CVT, 7-speed wet dual-clutch, our own 6AT, Aisin’s 6AT, and the platforms include CMA, BMA, and DMA. In short, what kind of car uses what platform, what kind of engine, and what kind of gearbox. Very targeted and rich in products! He was the first to use ACC and pre-collision system, and now he is the first to popularize L2 intelligent driving. These all illustrate his digestion and application of Volvo technology! On the other hand, Chery's medium-sized SUV Tiger 8 also uses the same 1.5T low-efficiency engine as the small SUV Tiger 3, with a 6-speed dry dual-clutch! Say he has strong skills? How embarrassing is this?
Speaking of technology, we can currently produce our own engines and engine computers, and we write the programs for the engine computers ourselves. We also have automatic transmissions, including transmission control computers and control programs. , you can do it all yourself. The earliest ones I know are BYD and Chery. Geely and Changan should also be free from the control of suppliers in recent years. Most of the others still purchase engines, OEM or technology.
BYD developed ABS by itself, and the doctor immediately negotiated with BYD to reduce the price of more than 2,000 yuan to a few hundred yuan. Later, BYD did not develop ABS by itself, but instead developed ESP by itself. There are also engines. BYD and Chery were the first to design and produce them by themselves, and the most difficult thing is that the engine management computer programs are calibrated by themselves. About ten years ago, BYD F3 used an imported Mitsubishi engine. Now the 1.5, 1.5T and 2.0T engines are all produced using their own technology and there are no technical patent disputes.
There are also new energy technologies and traditional automobiles. Foreign investment has been in the industry for more than a hundred years, and many patents are in the hands of others. But new energy technology is different. The technology of Chinese companies is leading the world. Our country can produce the best products in terms of batteries, controllers, and motors. Currently, BYD is the only one that excels in new energy buses. Other manufacturers also want to do this, but they don't have the technology. Only Tesla can compete with pure electric cars, and only BYD can compete with hybrid cars.
Hello, the author of the question, this is a domestic car manufacturer, and I am here to answer your question uninvited.
In terms of technology, it is understandable that Chery ranks first. Chery was the first to develop engines in China and has achieved good results. The current Chery engine warranty is 10 years or 100,000 kilometers, which proves that Chery engines With the confidence, Chery was the first to have its own high-end brand Qoros. Although the price is high and the sales volume is low, we cannot deny that it is a good car.
Ranked second is BYD New Energy. The reason why it is ranked behind Chery is that new energy now has many problems that need to be solved. However, domestically speaking, BYD is the dominant player in new energy technology, ranging from micro cars to e1 to medium and large cars, BYD's new energy has also been improved, because BYD is a battery manufacturer, battery technology, and motor technology are all produced in-house, while other car companies are patchwork, and BYD's lifetime warranty on battery cells is also provided by other car companies It can't be done.
Thirdly, Geely has created a world entirely through acquisitions and marketing. Isn’t the acquisition of Volvo just for its technology? Some netizens answered that Volvo will not provide technology to Geely, but Geely's Lynk & Co car still has Volvo technology to some extent. It cannot be ruled out that Geely will use it in its own cars. I believe Geely will slowly study Volvo, penetrate Volvo, and provide itself with more technology.
The fourth is Changan. Changan’s appearance has been steadily rising in recent years. Although Changan is the earliest military industrial enterprise, it has developed into the most beautiful domestic car. It relies solely on appearance. and interior decoration have boosted its sales, and compared with independent second- and third-tier cars, Changan's technology is still excellent
Okay, here is the domestically produced cars, choose the car, provide you with cost-effective domestic car information
Let me rank it, first please add the Great Wall! First, Great Wall cannot be ignored because it is unfair. After all, it is the number one SUV in the country. Second, this ranking needs to be separated, because BYD focuses on electric vehicles, and it is unfair for them to be ranked together with fuel vehicles. Let’s just rank them in the field of fuel vehicles, which are divided into sedans and SUVs. From the perspective of sedans, they are: Chery (Chery has the most reliable engines and gearboxes), Geely, Changan, and BYD. SUV ranking: Great Wall, Changan, Geely, Chery, BYD.
1. If ranked by gasoline engine technology: 1 Geely, 2 Chery, 3 BYD, 4 Changan.
Reason: Geely acquired Volvo and transformed its technology into Borui Boyue and Lynk & Co 01 and 02. Then it acquired brands such as Lotus and became the owner of Mercedes-Benz. It has a bright future and the technological transformation should be terrifying. Chery's engine technology is well-known in China, and its export volume ranks first. BYD is also innovative in engines. It is not surprising that Changan, which was born out of the van production line, ranks last!
2. If ranked by new energy technology: 1 Bei Yad, 2 Geely, 3 Chery, 4 Changan
Reason: BYD has accumulated experience in the three major electric vehicles, especially lithium batteries. The profound skill is obvious to all. Geely was the first to cooperate with Zhidou to accumulate experience and announced that 90% of its output in 2020 will be new energy. Chery immediately changed QQ to new energy EQ, and the market response was very good. Of course, there is still some sales gap with Zotye E200! It’s still too late for Changan to start new energy!
Xinnengcheyue: Focus on the marketing of new energy vehicles!