These are understandable, but there is a phenomenon that people don't understand: young people in rural areas are scrambling to buy a house, but they can't live after renovation. On the contrary, they took their wives and children on the same road as their parents. The whole family went to distant cities to work, and finally had to spend their hard-earned wages on renting houses in cities. Is it really worth it?
I asked a friend who was forced to make such a choice. They are mainly for economic and development considerations. Generally speaking, housing prices in most cities are lower than those in first-and second-tier cities. However, for the vast majority of rural people, the pressure is still great. Buying a house is just a down payment, and there are still many mortgages to be paid back. Only through work can they be rewarded.
But if you only work in your hometown, your salary is very low and your job choices are limited. It is very unrealistic to support your family by working in your hometown. So we have no choice but to go to coastal first-and second-tier cities to work and pay off the mortgage.
From this analysis, it is not difficult to understand why young people in rural areas spend all their savings on buying a house in the county, leaving a new house instead of living, but choosing to work in other places.