What exactly did Fan Paopao do?

Fan Paopao

[Edit this paragraph]069405

Formerly known as Fan Meizhong, a native of Longchang, Sichuan. He graduated from Longchang No. 2 Middle School in 1992 and was admitted to Peking University in 1997. After graduating from the History Department of Peking University in 2001, he worked as a teacher at Shuguang Middle School in Zigong. Soon after, he resigned due to his remarks in class, and then worked in the media and teaching industries in Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Chongqing, Beijing, Hangzhou, and Chengdu. He once worked in the "China Economic Times" and " He serves as editor of Southern Sports and other media, and has published "The Pursuit of Meaningful Education", ""Passenger": Walking to Resist Empty Garbage", ""Kite": The Soul's Guilt and Confession", and "Using Concepts to Defeat Concepts—— Read "Hayek's Biography", and you can search for Fan Meizhong's articles on Tianya BBS, first-line education forums, etc. Currently working at Dujiangyan Guangya School in Sichuan.

It is called Running Fan in foreign media reports

The reason why Fan Paopao got its name:

[Edit this paragraph]

When the 5.12 earthquake occurred, I left my students alone and ran out of the classroom. On May 22, I posted an article on Tianya titled "The Earth was Shaking at That Moment—A Personal Account of the "5.12" Wenchuan Earthquake", which was detailed in the article. He described everything he did during the earthquake and his thoughts afterward.

According to the description, Fan Meizhong was taking a Chinese class at Guangya School in Dujiangyan, Sichuan, when the desk shook. However, based on some experience with earthquakes, Fan thought it was a minor earthquake, so he told the students not to panic. But before he finished speaking, the teaching building shook violently.

"I reacted instantly - a big earthquake! Then I rushed towards the stairs." Later, Fan Meizhong found that he was the first person to arrive at the football field, and waited for a long time before seeing students arriving one after another. Arriving at the playground, he then had a conversation with the students:

Fan: "Why don't you come out?"

Students: "We didn't react at first, we just saw you running away. We were so frightened that we hid under the table! We didn’t come out until the violent earthquake subsided! Teacher, why didn’t you take us out?”

Fan? : "I have never been a person who has the courage to sacrifice. I only care about my own life. Don't you know? I escaped very quickly when there was a fire in the middle of the night last time!"

Then, Fan Meizhong said to an opponent. He felt a little disappointed and the student said: "I am a person who pursues freedom and justice, but I am not someone who puts others before myself and has the courage to sacrifice myself! At this moment of life and death decision, only for my daughter can I consider sacrificing myself. , I won’t care about other people, even my mother, in this situation, because I can’t hold adults, and they can escape one by one at a moment’s notice. If it’s too dangerous, I will die with you. Meaning; if there is no danger, I don’t care about you and you are not in danger, let alone you are seventeen or eighteen years old!”

Fan Meizhong wrote: “This may be my self-exculpation, but I have no intention of doing so. Feeling of moral guilt, I also told the students, 'I will never be a person who bravely fights knife-wielding gangsters! '" These words set off a wave of waves on the forum.

Hence the name Fan Paopao

Fan Meizhong’s articles can be found on Tianya BBS, first-line education forums, etc.

Worked at Guangya School in Dujiangyan, Sichuan, but has now been suspended.

Attachment: Major Events of Fan Meizhong

[Edit this paragraph]

Memorial of "Fan Meizhong Incident"

May 22, 2008 9: 10: Fan Meizhong, a teacher from Guangya Middle School in Dujiangyan City, Sichuan Province, wrote "The Earth Shaked at That Moment - Personal Experience of the "5.12" Wenchuan Earthquake" in the Tianya Forum. The article mentioned: "I am a person who pursues freedom and justice. People are not people who have the courage to sacrifice themselves before others! In this moment of life and death decision, I can only consider sacrificing myself for my daughter. Others, even my mother, in this case I I won't care either.

Because I can’t hold an adult, and I can escape one by one at a critical moment. If it is too dangerous, there is no point in me dying with you; if there is no danger, I don’t care about you, and you are not in danger, not to mention that you are seventeen or eighteen years old. Got it! " These remarks aroused overwhelming criticism and abuse from netizens. At the same time, "Wuyue Sanren" published an article "Freedom and Morality - Starting from the "Fan Paopao" Incident" on his blog. "Fan Paopao" This is how the word appeared and became another name for Fan Meizhong on the Internet.

/publicforum/Content/books/1/106727.shtml

On May 25, Fan Meizhong was on the Internet. Tianya Forum published "Why I wrote "The Earth Shakes at That Moment"", responding to the reasons for writing the post and the criticism from netizens. However, there are still endless articles criticizing Fan on the Internet. "Fan Paopao challenges national tolerance and triggers moral "Great Criticism" ""Fan Paopao" is actually just a freak among teachers" "Fan Paopao does not need to apologize but must resign" "Do we still need to invite "Fan Paopao" to show shamelessness" "Fan Paopao", don't "take Shameless as smart!" "Fan Paopao" is a scumbag teacher" ""Fan Paopao", aren't you afraid of going to hell?" These articles criticized it from various aspects.

/ publicforum/Content/books/1/106826.shtml

On May 26, Bei'an published an article on Phoenix Blog: "Fan Meizhong: Discrediting teachers and embarrassing Peking University." The article pointed out: "Fan Meizhong is shameful and It's not that he ran away during the earthquake, but that he had to "publicize" his cowardly behavior after escaping. "

/postDetail.do?boardId=3amp; view=1amp; id=86534809

On June 6, Internet critic Guo Songmin published a blog post ""Fan Paopao" should become "A Mirror of the Chinese Elite", the article first cited the famous sinking of the "Titanic" and pointed out: "In this incident, the captain, many crew members and male passengers all sank together with the luxury cruise ship. At the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean, most of the people surviving in the ice are women and children who have the least ability to escape. "The article pointed out: "For the elite, the biggest tragedy is not dying in an earthquake or shipwreck, but being cast aside by the public! "Elites should actually seriously think about it. Are they like "Fan Paopao" who thinks too much about themselves and too little about the public at every critical moment?" Are you taking advantage of your advantageous position to seize too many benefits that belong to the public? ". Since then, many articles have begun to use the Titanic as an example to criticize Fan Meizhong's behavior.

/southnews/spqy/200806090023.asp

On June 12, netizens expressed their anger Published "Fan Meizhong is Worthy of Peking University", the article recorded the process of changing his understanding of Fan Meizhong, and pointed out: "Our society has long formed a traditional moral concept. This moral concept and the way it is implemented are seemingly impeccable. It is reasonable, but there are huge loopholes in the middle." This article caused widespread controversy in Peking University. Some people pointed out: 1. Peking University has always been committed to pursuing the truth, but the truth is not clearly understood by everyone, but absolute Do not succumb to the so-called "public opinion" and slander; 2. Peking University has always taken it as its responsibility to reflect on society, and Fan Meizhong has caused social reflection on moral issues in his own way.

/s/blog_46d54ecd01009qb1. html

On June 14, ifeng.com blogger Zhu Guangbing conducted a telephone interview with Guangya School in the evening. The interview record showed: “The education department has officially notified us that Teacher Fan’s teaching qualification will be revoked. Teacher Fan Without a teaching qualification, he is just like a driver without a driver's license, so we can no longer hire him." The school's teachers also said: "Most of the teachers think that his remarks are inappropriate and he is not qualified to be a teacher; among the students, some also say that he is good. There are also people who say bad things about him.

But the main reaction was strong from the students’ parents, who said they did not want our school to have such a person who “doesn’t even care about mothers” to teach their children. Fan Meizhong said that he thought the Ministry of Education’s approach was unreasonable: If he did not save the students but ran away first, he was not qualified to be a teacher, then he felt that it violated the Teacher Law. “Is there any provision that says teachers have to risk their lives?” Risking one's life, even sacrificing one's own life to save students"? If the first paragraph of his "At that moment, the earth shook and the mountains shook" shows that he is not patriotic, so he cannot be a teacher, he thinks it is nonsense. "Just because I criticize the country's issues, I cannot be said to be unpatriotic; nor can I be revoked as a teacher on the grounds that I am not patriotic. "Fan Meizhong said that there are too many citizens in China who do not resist the abuse of power by the administrative departments, but he is different. He will defend his rights and dignity at all costs. "The point is not whether I can win the case, even if it is I will defend my rights and freedom of speech at the cost of losing my job. "

/s/blog_54b3666701009ykd.html

On June 15, "Utopia" held a symposium of scholars and experts. Guo Linmin, Zhang Lingling and others participated. Some experts at the meeting believed: " Fan Meizhong wants to defeat the entire mainstream morality! I want to overturn the entire human morality! Very shameless! "; At the same time, "Phoenix TV is a "dung-picking machine", discussing topics that do not need to be discussed in a big way, confusing the values ????that should be very clear, which is very shameful!", "Those who support Fan Meizhong are especially shameless. !", "The success of our current education is the result of our Chinese nation's collectivism, socialism and heroism education!" Utopia also opened a special column to criticize Fan Paopao and carried out "The liberalism represented by Fan". Deeper analysis and criticism.

/domestic/945/20080615/14908892.html

On June 16, Fang Zhouzi, a commentator known for his opposition to "pseudoscience", published "Fan Meizhong will definitely be banned in the United States." School Expulsion," points out: The "Ethical Code for the Education Profession" formulated by the National Education Association stipulates: "Reasonable efforts must be made to protect students from situations that are harmful to learning, health, and safety." If this happened in the United States, Fan Meizhong would definitely be expelled from the school, and he would never want to be a teacher again in his life. The reason is simple: what he did was very unprofessional.

/pl/2008-06-16/091815752824.shtml

On June 16, Wang Xuming, spokesperson of the Ministry of Education, said in an interview with reporters that "the teacher who ran away first" was dismissed. Fan Meizhong's decision was made independently by his school and not by official instructions from the Ministry of Education. Wang Xuming stated that the Ministry of Education has not issued any notice calling for the cancellation of Fan Meizhong’s teaching qualification. But according to what he knows so far, Fan Meizhong's school has indeed issued a formal written notice of his dismissal. Dujiangyan Guangya School where Fan Meizhong teaches is a private school and has the right to fire Fan Meizhong in accordance with the relevant provisions of the "Law of the People's Republic of China and Private Education Promotion". On the same day, He Bing, deputy dean of the Law School of China University of Political Science and Law, said in an interview with Youth Weekend: "This is a case that deserves further study. If Fan Meizhong prepares to appeal, we will provide legal aid."

nb.com.cn/system/2008/06/19/005638275.shtml

On June 17, Principal Qing Guangya of Dujiangyan Guangya Middle School said in a telephone interview with Xinkuai reporter: Dujiangyan City The Education Bureau found him again on the morning of the 16th and conducted an interview for more than an hour. “The leaders of the Education Bureau told him that because Fan Meizhong published inappropriate words that had too great an impact, they are now verbally demanding that the school fire Fan Meizhong.” Zhou Zebang, secretary of the Discipline Inspection Commission of the Dujiangyan Education Bureau, said: “Private schools are responsible for firing and hiring teachers. "School behavior." When a reporter asked "whether the Education Bureau requested the dismissal of Fan Meizhong," Zhou Zebang said, "We exercise education management according to our functions."

Zhang Qing, director of the Dujiangyan Education Bureau, told reporters on the same day that according to relevant management regulations, if the Dujiangyan Education Bureau issues the certificate, the bureau will handle it in accordance with the "Teachers Law" and other relevant laws. However, according to their investigation, Fan Meizhong did not apply for a certificate to the bureau. The bureau has asked Guangya School to provide relevant certificates of Fan Meizhong, but has not received any reply so far.

/news/2008-06/19/content_856541.htm

On June 19, Oriental Daily published Cao Lin’s commentary article “Don’t underestimate the value of Fan Meizhong”. The article stated: Fan Meizhong exposed his true thoughts and the dark side of his human nature. This is an opportunity that can prompt us to reflect on human nature, reflect on morality, and improve ourselves. But such an excellent resource for reflection has been regarded by pseudo-moralists and angry Internet youths as a moral criticism movement to build a chastity arch." At the same time, he also published "I feel that Principal Guangya hopes to scold those who repair buildings and repair buildings." "The Collapsed Man" proposed that when the house collapsed, the teacher left the students to escape alone. This may not be the result of careful consideration, but an instinctive survival response when danger comes - this instinct is unethical, but it can be forgiven because Everyone may have this instinct. This instinct just fails to fulfill their moral responsibility to save others and does not harm the interests of others. But it is unforgivable to cut corners when building a house, use iron wire instead of steel bars, and mix sand with cement. Well, that is not a survival instinct, but seeking wealth and killing for one's own selfish interests, and putting other people's lives in danger for the sake of profit. Of course, those who deserve to be scolded the most are those who repair and collapse buildings. .

/col305/col1003/article.htm1?id=801869

On June 20, Cao Lin, editor of China Youth Daily, published a commentary article "Peking University takes Fan Paopao as its Shame on Loss of University Spirit", believes: Peking University can express its own moral stance on the escape incident and criticize its own students, but on the issue of "expulsion", it should adhere to the value position of freedom of thought and freedom of speech and stand firm as its alma mater. Stand firmly on the side of your students, stand firmly on the side of freedom as a bastion of freedom, fight for the rights of students, fight for space for freedom, refuse administrative power to interfere with educational autonomy, and refuse to punish crimes with words.

/ chinanet/07news/china.cgi?docid=1702959822095701427,17007714254156917318,0amp;server=192.168.3.137amp;port=5757

On June 21, the Beijing News published Lin Da’s article "Fan Meizhong should be fired" ", the article takes Mr. Churchill during the 911 incident in the United States as an example, pointing out that although his remarks touched the public outrage of the American people, his school "still supports his due rights because academic freedom must be maintained without interference. "Principle", the article proposes: "Having good ideological and moral character" in the "Education Law" is a necessary condition for teacher qualifications. As a legal provision, its definition is unclear. What is a good thought? Who will judge and define it? ? Such legal provisions that may be interpreted arbitrarily are the focus of attention. ”

.com/today/zhuanlan/2008/06/21/4869728.shtml

June. On the 25th, Guangzhou Daily published a comment by psychologist Zhang Jiehai: "We are too tolerant of "inappropriate remarks."" The article cited the "James Watson" incident in the United States and the "former Harvard University President Larry Summers" incident. Pointing out that the United States is also a country that punishes crimes based on words, the article finally points out: "If you don't punish his "crimes", this is objectively equivalent to encouraging all teachers to learn from him."

"

/southnews/jwxy/200806260041.asp

On June 26, the Ministry of Education announced the newly revised "Code of Professional Ethics for Primary and Secondary School Teachers (Draft for Comments)" on its official website )", "Protecting student safety" was added for the first time, and a large discussion began online about the implementation details of the Teacher Law and Ethics Regulations. Public opinion generally believed that this was Fan's contribution. However, Jingchu.com published "Protecting Students. "How can the Ministry of Safety and Education shirk responsibility?", the article points out: Compared with various aspects such as the renovation of dilapidated buildings and students' safety awareness, teachers are at the end of the chain and play the most limited role in protecting students' safety. At this time, the Ministry of Education is more We should use the power of public opinion to work with relevant departments to solve various deep-seated problems that threaten the safety of teachers and students, and come up with specific measures and timetables to make the chain of student protection solid and secure.

/edoas/website18/level3.jsp?tablename=217amp;infoid=1214364294849397

/s/2008-06-30/140215843185.shtml