We all know that the order of generations in a family tree is a way of identifying the generations of people in the family. In the past, families had a large population, and some of them would be scattered to other places. Since each person's situation was different, the duration of the descendants was also different. After a few generations, when people of the same clan met together, they only needed to inform each other of their names. You can immediately know who is growing up and who is late. A simple naming rule is a very good generation management system. As for the name of your own child, I think it can be judged based on the actual situation. If people in your family are more concerned about this issue of generation, it is better to change it. Otherwise, it will easily make a joke, and the elders in the family will not understand it. Comfortable. If people in your family don't pay much attention to this issue now, and you think it won't have any impact if you don't change it, then it's fine if you don't change it. Because it's a girl, her descendants are generally not recorded in the genealogy (haha, this tradition is now It hasn’t been completely reformed yet, so that’s all it can do). If it is a boy, if he does not want to change his name, he can give him another name according to his generation, and record this name in the family tree. His descendants must avoid these problems. The name is not only for outsiders to see, but also a generational identifier of one's own family. Today, people have fewer children, and some old traditions have faded, but the actual problem (generationality) will not disappear because of this.