Why? Is it to better fight the autumn wind? As mentioned earlier, when Jia Mu wanted to see Grandma Liu, Grandma Liu refused. If it was really to fight the autumn wind better, I'm afraid that when Jia Mu said she wanted to see her, she would go there in a hurry. So what is reflected here is probably not Grandma Liu's scheming, but that she is a simple farmer, and she will work hard to repay anyone who treats her well. Jia Mu was kind to her, so she followed her farmer's wisdom and worked hard to please Jia Mu, whether it was acting as a "female striper", saying what the old lady liked to hear, or even being teased by Sister Feng and the others without getting angry. This is the reason. , instead of scheming against the autumn wind. It can be seen from this that Grandma Liu is a kind-hearted person.
So, Mr. Liang, your evaluation of Grandma Liu’s artistic performances and showboating is not quite correct, and it is also an over-interpretation. The Jia family showed pity to the poor and cherished the old, and Grandma Liu knew her shame and gratitude. Only then could she "return with a full load" behind her.
In reality, there is no shortage of such "artistic performances" and "acting to be ugly", but if you use this to catch the autumn wind, I can only say that if you can succeed, it is just because you are lucky and the person who helps you is the one who helps you. Be virtuous. And if you still think that you have been beaten hard by the autumn wind, you are not only incompetent, shameless, and ungrateful, but you also regard other people's moral character as your own ability!
Grandma Liu still knows her shame and kindness, but those who "act and act ugly" are not even as good as Grandma Liu! Therefore, I hope that people like this in reality will reflect on themselves, and I also hope that everyone will not think that this is correct and effective.
The third time he entered Jia's Mansion, he was approved by Zhizhi. At that time, Jia's Mansion had been defeated. Cao Gong's intention must be: to use Grandma Liu's first and second entrances, and from the perspective of this little person, to write about "flowers blooming brocade, fire cooking oil" before the defeat of the Jia family, and then during the third entrance, using Grandma Liu's perspective The decline of the Jia family is written from the perspective of this little person, forming a sharp contrast between before and after. Moreover, Grandma Liu came to repay the kindness she received during her first and second visits. As far as Jia Qiaoer's verdict is concerned, she saved Jia Qiaoer, who was about to be sold into a brothel by her "ruthless uncle and traitorous brother", and her purpose was to repay her kindness. Due to the anecdotes in the later articles, we do not know whether Grandma Liu did other acts of repayment, but as far as this act is concerned, we can also know that Grandma Liu is not as unworthy as the conspiracy theorists say.
Therefore, you should keep your eyes open to distinguish clearly the knowledge of fighting the autumn wind shown in "A Dream of Red Mansions".
Because it is Bu Cai's favorite "Dream of Red Mansions", I can't help but talk about it at length here. I originally wanted to answer this question when I saw it, but I didn't dare to write it. I was afraid that it would be superficial and miss the mark and not be able to hit the nail on the head. If it was too deep, I was afraid that I would overinterpret it, so I didn't dare to write it. I wanted to read all the netizens first. of high opinion. Only then did I see Teacher Liang’s answer, and I couldn’t help but vomit. Mostly for the sake of seeking truth from facts, if there is any offense in any words, I hope that Teacher Liang and all readers will forgive me!
2017.08.19 Supplementary unified reply to some comments:
First of all, thank you again for your approval! This article went unnoticed for the first two days, but later it was appreciated by everyone, and I am very happy. Thank you again for your approval!
Of course, there are also different voices in the comments that refute mine, probably about 4 or 5 people. It's good to have different opinions. I'm not an expert, and I don't dare to engage in "one-note speech." I pursue modesty and prudence! It's just that the content of your rebuttals is generally not correct. For example, you may say that Lao Liang "was not wrong in terms of human nature and sophistication", or simply refute me by saying that "the perspective is different". Let me clarify again: I agree with what Lao Liang said is right, but is this what I refute? So what was my rebuttal?
It is certainly correct to say that there is some kind of "human sophistication" that can be called ugly. Such a phenomenon does exist in reality, but there is something wrong with his citation of scriptures. Grandma Liu is really a Is it what Lao Liang said? I believe those who have read the book will know it well.
So it would be fine if Lao Liang quoted other more consistent classics to explain this kind of "human nature", but there are many inconsistencies between what Grandma Liu said and what he said. This is why I want to write this article. What are the refutations of Lao Liang? I hope you will not misunderstand me again!
In my answer to Lao Liang, I did not refute his good points and bad points in general, but agreed with him on the basis of the good ones, and based on the basis, reason, and objective facts on the bad ones. refute. So I hope that if you refute me, please do it in the same way. Seek truth from facts, convince people with reason, and when you refute me, bring sufficient evidence, rather than a general subjective opinion of who is right and who is wrong. This is called discussion. It's not that you first misunderstood me and then refuted me based on this misunderstanding, or refuted me based on subjective opinions, or even avoided the important and trivial, and only refuted me based on what Lao Liang was right about. Is this what I am refuting? Right? (laughing)
It’s good to agree, bad to seek truth from facts and speak with reason, and let you have your own opinions on controversial areas. I haven’t changed a single word of my article since I wrote it. You can check to see if that’s what I did! Maybe if you take a closer look, you won't have the above misunderstandings about me.
It’s good to have different voices, so I patiently responded and explained to these people one by one instead of folding them directly. It has not been folded yet. However, if you do not understand the content of my article first, have some misunderstanding of me, or do not provide sufficient evidence, you will only talk in subjective generalities, or even just use what Lao Liang is right to refute me. , do you think you came to me to discuss it, or more like to come to find trouble? Right? (laughing)
A person’s speech on the Internet also represents his or her own level and even character. Even if we disagree with other people’s answers, we should know how to leave a certain amount of discretion and respect for each other. Be decent. You know better than to be arrogant and think that you are the only one who understands various things. Others are idiots who don't understand anything. You talk to others in such an unkind tone, right?