As soon as the nomination list came out, it immediately caused controversy. This is mainly due to the shortlisting of new generation actors such as Liu Haocun, Zhou Ye and Jackson Yee, and the absence of Mesozoic actors such as Amanda, Yolanda and Zhang Songwen who performed well this year. In the current public opinion environment that is quite sensitive to "flow", the nomination of actors for the Golden Rooster Award is almost against the sky.
The comments of netizens are very clear, which are aimed at the three "newcomers" of the actor award, Jackson Yee, Liu Haocun and Zhou Ye. Then analyze whether their choices are reliable.
Jackson Yee Jackson Yee nominated Little Red Flower for Best Actor, which seems to me to be the most normal of the three. In Better Days, Jackson Yee was nominated for the best actor in mainstream awards including Golden Rooster Award, Hong Kong Academy Award and Ding Hua Award, and also won the Best Newcomer Award in the Academy Award and the Best Newcomer Award in Hundred Flowers Award.
Jackson Yee's acting skills are not superb for a young man who is not an actor, but fortunately, his personal style and temperament are quite close to the young and stubborn juvenile role in the film. All the films he participated in magnified his personal advantages rather than shortcomings. Although his role in Little Red Flower lacks some tension compared with Better Days, his personal performance is remarkable.
Liu Haocun's selection is the most controversial on the Internet. Compared with Zhou Dongyu's amazing performances in Good Days and Jackson Yi, Liu Hao's performance in Little Red Flower can only be described as "mediocre" at most. In my opinion, it is even better than the role of Liu Haocun in Above the Cliff and One Second.
Liu Hao plays the role of a horse in Little Red Flower. In my opinion, there is no chance to beat Hi, Mom and Zhang He in My Sister. As for Liu Mintao, goodbye! Teenagers are chosen. The film has little attention and box office, and Liu Mintao's performance in the film doesn't seem to have reached a breaking point. I think the final winner is "choose one from two".
The reason why Liu Haocun's nomination was so opposed by netizens in Weibo is probably that acting is not the main problem, but the news of the rapid rise of her "resource coffee" and the "black history" of her mother's dance training class before. If Liu Haocun finally wins the prize, it is foreseeable that an online public opinion field will come.
If Zhou also said that the box office and word-of-mouth harvest of a small red flower gave two young protagonists the opportunity to nominate, then it would be almost "nonsense" for Zhou to nominate the best female companion with "192 1". Originally, 192 1 was a chivalrous drama. Except Huang Xuan and NiNi, who are the subjects of narrative perspective, there are not many other starring roles. I'm afraid Zhou's shots in the film add up to less than 5 minutes.
Shortness is not a problem. After all, Anthony Hopkins won the Oscar for Best Actor with The Silence of the Lambs in only 16 minutes, but how could Zhou Ye's performance be nominated? From the audience's point of view, I really can't find any reason to make Zhou Ye's performance stand out in the past few minutes. Compared with powerful groups such as Zhu Yuanyuan and Liu Jia, Zhou Ye's nomination is probably just a familiar face.
Conclusion The global proportion of Chinese movie box office is becoming the first ticket warehouse, but the heavyweight awards that can really convince most people and have the right to speak have not yet appeared. If the Golden Rooster Award wants to be an award that satisfies the public and is recognized by professionals, it probably needs to be more cautious from the nomination, and the selection logic is clearer, so that popularity belongs to popularity, acting belongs to acting, and technology belongs to technology.