but if you look for it now, the advantage will be lost. You have to take a guarantee that you don't want to have a second child.
This policy of giving birth to a second child makes the position of professional women in China hold half the sky in jeopardy. When Didi surrogacy has not been liberalized like Didi Daijia, and when the artificial uterus technology is still intact, they clamored for extending maternity leave and not giving professional women a way out?
Recruit a female worker, give birth to a baby, take maternity leave, have another baby, and then take maternity leave. I want to take maternity leave longer, longer, and grow to 3 days. You are the boss and the leader. I'm afraid your face will grow longer and turn green, too.
It is the bounden duty of an enterprise to maximize the benefits. Those who clamor for extending maternity leave are either male chauvinism that is easy to talk about, or they are out of their minds on paper, or they are not kind. It is really good for women to find a job and have a sense of security that they dare to have children. It is called picking sesame seeds and losing watermelons for just a few months of maternity leave.
It is also possible to extend the maternity leave for women with a second child, provided that the leave must be put aside by men before it grows. It is this gender-neutral approach that European countries rely on to support women's position in half the sky. Practice has proved that this approach is very useful, so China might as well borrow it. Recruit a woman to take maternity leave, and recruit a man to take longer maternity leave, which is the same for both men and women, so that the gender discrimination of the employer will be smaller.
It's true that one kind of rights and interests of women can't be sacrificed for another. It's easy to criticize and write. What's the reality?
Maternity leave and confinement is a good day and welfare for women in China. In many countries, professional women who go to work one week and one month after giving birth abound, either as housewives, without having to spend maternity leave with enterprises, or as a woman who can afford to have a rest.
Physiologically speaking, it's not unfair to women. As long as men take long maternity leave and take care of their children at home, women's bodies can eat it. This extension does not make much sense to women's physical recovery, but only increases the employer's further fear of female employees, which makes no sense.
hey, you have to prepare to support the elderly, you have to prepare to support the children, and you have to help the children take care of their grandchildren. If you don't save some money to lay a material foundation, can you support it? If you want to take more maternity leave, women will lose their jobs. Can men afford it? Work is big, earning money is big, and maternity leave is small. It is not a matter as long as 3 days or as short as three months.
First of all, I believe that 99% of people will agree with this topic. As a person who is going to be a father in a month, I agree with both hands. My daughter-in-law vomited badly three or four months before pregnancy, and everyone became fatter when she was pregnant. Our daughter-in-law really lost more than ten kilograms of meat a few months ago. She vomited whatever she ate, and she still had to eat with tears in her eyes. She also advised herself that it was worthwhile not to eat, even if she ate ten mouthfuls and vomited nine and a half. I witnessed my daughter-in-law's joyful smile when she changed from a little girl to a mother. I also saw her rapid maturity in the past few months, becoming self-reliant, knowing how to take care of herself, and becoming more like a mother ... Especially when she was diagnosed as twins after three months of examination, I felt that the whole world was smiling at me at that moment. That feeling is really wonderful! ! !
My daughter-in-law will be born in more than a month, but now she has trouble moving, and her feet are swollen and her legs are swollen. Maternity leave is 188 days (basic 128 days, twins 3 and caesarean section 3). But this is far from enough. Children need their mothers, and mothers need their children more. Children who go out in rural areas do not have such good conditions to take their children and their mothers-in-law to work in cities. . Therefore, during breastfeeding, you should either wean early or take leave all the time! ! ! I feel that the extension of maternity leave is social progress and the care of the "upper class" for the working class! If a referendum can be held, I think it will take a few days for this proposal to become a bill! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
maternity leave is extended to nearly one year, and most people in the comment area agree. Personally, I am very opposed to it: First, it is difficult for women to find jobs, and then unmarried women of school age will be discriminated against unconsciously in employment; Second, the real economy has been unable to move, and it is unrealistic to vacate funds and positions for women who have babies, and all the expenses are borne by enterprises; Third, social development is changing with each passing day. One year's time will make women's work seriously out of touch with society. It is not enough to take a 158-day break to take care of their children. More than 3 days is enough? Fourth, this idea is good for the country and good for female babies. I really can't think of anything else to promote. Has China come to the point where European countries offer high welfare? No, so why put all this pressure on enterprises and make them have to do it? I am also a mother. In order to avoid losing social competitiveness, I personally feel that it is very kind for enterprises to take maternity leave for half a year in accordance with state regulations, so don't ask for more, otherwise the mothers themselves will be hurt in the end.
Basically, I agree with men or women who have no employment pressure. In fact, I am pregnant now, and my company is a private enterprise. The situation is that basically those who have given birth can't go back. When you are not on vacation, no one will do your job, and the company will recruit someone else. When you come back, there will be an extra person. The company will deduct your salary in disguise and do endless work for you, and then it will be judged that you are incompetent or basically incompetent. When the company recruits people, it will also ask the children whether there are elderly people who bring and give birth to a second child. Basically, it recruits women over 4 years old because the chances of giving birth to a second child are low. It is said that men who take care of their children at home earn money from straight men's cancer, or they are lazy and lazy. No matter how underground they are, they don't want to go to work. They just want to wait for someone to support their hearts. There is also a kind of woman who is immersed in doting on her children and can't leave my family for a minute. Of course, the front refers to long-term work, not that children really can't go to work without old people before they are 2 years old. Too many examples tell us that most women are free nannies at home if they have no financial resources. If your mother-in-law looks down on you and your husband complains about you, you have to work hard, otherwise you will have to reach out for money to buy things for your children and be left behind. Women can also earn money to support their families, and they don't have to earn less from men, but they also have to bear the pain of pregnancy and childbirth, while men don't give birth or take it. If maternity leave must be added, it is better to impose it on men, and men and women should be given it for half a year, so that men and women are equal and children are taken care of, and it will not cause employment pressure on women.
3 days of maternity leave, some people must be happy and some people are sad.
First, most women are still very happy. They can rest for 3 days and have more time to take care of the baby and recover after the baby is born.
Secondly, there are still some women who have mixed feelings. The happiness is the same as the first situation. The worry is that this will make the employment space for women smaller and smaller, and most enterprises will give more consideration to the issue of female fertility when employing people.
Third, employers will definitely not be happy, especially private enterprises. The company invites an employee to give birth to a child without going to work for a year, but no one works. Although social security is paid and maternity allowance is paid, there are still many hidden problems. If the newly recruited employees take over the work of the maternity, the maternity will have nowhere to put it when she comes back. If we say that we will no longer recruit new employees, then other colleagues will share the work of maternity. If there are several maternity leave at the same time in the unit, it will be even worse, especially for small private enterprises, which are unable to bear such labor costs. In addition, if a person doesn't work for ten months in a row, it is very likely that his work efficiency will be reduced in all aspects when he returns to his post, and it will take a month or two to adapt, which is not what the work unit likes. This will inevitably lead to more gender discrimination in unit recruitment.
In fact, the original intention of the state to implement such a policy is to protect women's rights and interests. However, I still hope that the state can fully consider and properly handle the possible problems together, so as not to make the 3-day long holiday "indefinitely extended" and let more women make a difficult choice between children and work.
I suggest that women go home and have children, and don't come out to harm enterprises. Three births are still 3 days away, which enterprise dares to recruit, unless it is within the system and has a sense of social responsibility. If this policy can be introduced, it will actually prevent women from getting married and having children in disguise. Is this divorced from reality policy in line with national requirements and public expectations? Although I am a woman, as a senior HR, I really see how difficult it will be for women in the future, and it will have a far-reaching impact on men and the future national population policy. Personally, I firmly oppose it!
yes.
first, half a month before delivery, I began to take a vacation to prepare for delivery.
Second, 42 days after delivery, confinement.
Third, 42- 3 months after delivery, pelvic floor muscles recover.
Fourth, three to six months after delivery, all functions of the body are restored.
5. From six months to nine months after delivery, the baby will be added with complementary food during the transition period, and the baby will be trained to turn over, sit and climb. After half a year, the baby's immunity will begin to decline from the mother. Special attention should be paid to this stage.
Sixth, in the tenth month after delivery, stop breastfeeding and prepare before going to work.
three hundred days of personal opinion is advisable. Taking a good maternity leave is the basis for better returning to the workplace. After the maternity leave is over, the mother can take advantage of the spare time with the children to continue learning, and the maternity leave can also be effective and meaningful!
First of all, I don't have a job now, and I am at home with peace of mind, so whether I agree or disagree, extending maternity leave has nothing to do with me, and I don't intend to have a second child, let alone maternity leave in the future.
I am very much in favor of extending maternity leave to 3 days. At present, maternity leave is mostly about 5 months. Often, expectant mothers need to stay at home for maternity leave one month before delivery. First, their bodies are getting heavier and heavier, which is not suitable for continuing overwork. Second, they need to prepare for delivery. There are many mothers around me who choose to take a vacation one month before delivery and continue to work when the baby is 4 months old. In fact, the time spent with the children is far less than the maternity leave time.
At this time, the biggest feeling is reluctant, whose baby hurts, and who will go to work after just getting along with the baby for a few months. Any mother will be reluctant, and she will spend more time at work thinking about her children in a daze, and her work efficiency is not as good as before. In addition, breast-feeding has become a big problem. Although it can be sucked and refrigerated, it is not as good as self-feeding after all. Whether it is the freshness of milk or promoting the relationship between mother and child, it has become a regret in children's growth. Then what if all the family members have no time, they are at work, or they can't concentrate on taking care of the children, so it is necessary to hire a nanny. My brother's sister-in-law's house is that the couple have a teacher and a bank clerk, and the old people on both sides are either at work or in other places. Fortunately, the aunt invited is nice and caring for the children, but in case they meet the kind of heartless people circulating on the Internet, they are not at ease.
So generally speaking, the advantages of extending maternity leave outweigh the disadvantages. Although I still have to go to work after 3 days, at that time, my child will be nearly one year old, so I can stop breastfeeding and say some simple words. Compared with giving up after four months, I am definitely relieved. Now I am 8 months pregnant and gave birth years ago. I plan to feed it for about one and a half years if I have enough breast milk, and then give it to my grandmother to take care of it before going out to work. I was somewhat uneasy about giving it to my mother-in-law early.
Although "extending maternity leave to one year" is still in the stage of proposal and investigation, it should be implemented sooner or later, because, after all, it is a "popular project" from the perspective of caring for the health of women and infants.
one of the benefits is that it is beneficial to women's physical and mental health. Childbearing is an important event in women's life, and it is also an important turning point in life. Although most physiological indexes of parturient can be recovered within 6 to 8 weeks, due to the influence of breastfeeding and other factors, the full recovery time may actually be as long as 6 months to 1 year. Extending maternity leave to one year will effectively reduce the occurrence of postpartum depression, reshape the body shape and improve women's self-confidence.
second, it is beneficial to the scientific rearing of babies. From birth to one year old, it is the most important stage of children's physical and mental development, and it is the real starting line of life. During this period, it is necessary not only to breastfeed as much as possible, but also to communicate frequently between mother and baby. One year's stay with a full-time mother can make the baby grow healthily, with a stronger body and a more sound personality.
Third, it helps to liberate spouses and other family members. The short maternity leave for women not only distracts new mothers from their work, but also distracts new fathers and even implicates other family members. And if women can look after children full-time, men can be freed and released, creating more value for society. For the development of social productive forces, there are more advantages than disadvantages.
the fourth benefit is to adjust the employment structure. Women return to work after giving birth for three months, so it is necessary to hire a nanny or other family members to take full-time care of their children, so it has not actually changed the number of employed people and will not make any additional contribution to society. Extending maternity leave will undoubtedly redistribute jobs and be more conducive to everyone's play.
the fifth benefit is to solve the problem of low fertility rate. Although the country has relaxed the family planning policy, from "having two children" to "having two children alone" and even brewing "letting go of the second child", many young people still choose to give up having a second child. The problem of aging population due to low fertility rate is increasingly prominent, and the unreasonable population structure and insufficient labor force will restrict the development of society in the future. Although there are various reasons for the low fertility rate, the short maternity leave is also an important factor. Extending maternity leave to one year later will help more young parents get rid of their worries and increase their willingness to have children.
"extending maternity leave" benefits the country and the people, and people are naturally happy with it. But perhaps, some enterprises are worried that the extension of maternity leave will increase labor costs and increase the burden. The author believes that this kind of worry is unnecessary. Once the New Deal is implemented, supporting measures should be introduced at the same time, which can improve maternity insurance, so that the state, units and individuals can share it and avoid all the pressure being passed on to enterprises. As long as the implementation is in place, it can be solved together.
It is estimated that many girls are very happy to see the maternity leave increased to 3 days, and they absolutely agree with each other. Now that the second child is released, it is estimated that the fertility rate can be improved.
in fact, this can be said from two aspects: maternity and children. Women should have enough time to recover after giving birth to their children. It is even more important for children. With the extension of maternity leave, mothers have more time to accompany their children's growth and meet their needs in time. Moreover, the average child drinking breast milk has certain benefits for physical development and resistance. If maternity leave is extended, breast-feeding can also be extended. So it is very beneficial to both the baby and the mother.