This is Zhang Zhichun, who came to sell books and courses and act as a magician to make money. He opposes the four pillars and eight characters. There is nothing wrong with his own theories in my opinion. Yi Xue can have new tools, but hard work It would be arrogant and arrogant to describe one's own theory as being closer to the origin of Qimen Dunjia and to resort to frivolous means. The inheritance of Qimen can be traced back to the works of the Tang Dynasty, including Li Quan's "The Divine Mechanism to Enemy Taibai Yin Jing", Zhao Pu's "Secret Tongxuan Transformation Liuyin Cave Wei Dunjia Zhenjing", Liu Bowen's "Golden Han Jade Mirror Qimen Dunjia" "Encyclopedia of Cheats" and the Qing Dynasty royal secret book "Yu Ding Qi Men Bao Jian" are all traceable. Zhang Zhichun inherited this context after all, and did not create it out of thin air. For the sake of dissemination and popularization, some places are indeed too casual, but There is no problem with the recognized entry-level naturalization.
In addition, whether it is Qimen, Bazi, Plum Blossom, Da Liuren, or Ziwei, they are all application tools of Yi Xue, and they are all "techniques". The original Yi principles are interlinked, and the accuracy of each school is the same. Yes, otherwise it would not have spread to this day. Wang Weiguang insists on limiting Qimen to the era of only innate gossip. In my opinion, I am a conceited person who is limited by his knowledge and has no regard for the development and progress of future generations.
Putting aside his character, I have never learned whether his theory is accurate. I don’t know. Yi Xue can have new "techniques", but as a prediction technique, it can only rely on a large number of cases to accumulate accuracy and accuracy. Only through popularity can the skills be passed down, but now if you search, you can't find any relevant cases, and only a comrade with the same name appears when you search for his name.