A client talked to me about the issue of naming her child. The client asked me how her child *Mohan's name was, and said that her child's name was chosen using naming software, and the score was all right. It's 99 points.
In fact, from a professional perspective, the naming software itself is of no use. Why do you say that? Because many naming software do not take into account the horoscope of a person's birth date, let alone analyze the image of each character, the five elements between characters, etc., they just count the number of strokes of the character in a rigid manner, and calculate the meaning according to the five grids. The cross-section method, (the five-square cross-section method is also called the Japanese "Kumazaki nomenclature" and was founded by the Japanese Takeo Kumazaki based on the Chinese Yixue mathematics) gives some so-called auspicious names that conform to the combination of five-square strokes. This is obviously wrong. . There are also some naming software that have added the time of birth and given the lucky and unfavorable gods of the horoscope, which five elements should be added to the name, and which five elements should be avoided. It seems very professional. In fact, it is just a decoration and has no effect. Easy learning emphasizes difficulty, change and simplicity. The Bazi subject is the most flexible and changeable in Yi Xue, and it is difficult to make correct judgments without years of skill. The likes and taboos of the five elements in numerology are not clear, so the naming is rootless. It is wrong for the naming software to simply use the prosperity and decline of the horoscope as a way to judge the gods of the horoscope. The likes and taboos of the five elements in numerology have nothing to do with the number of certain five elements. Some horoscopes already have a lot of water in the five elements, but when you see water, it is still a special pattern for the god of joy. For example, from a weak pattern to a strong pattern, the naming software still uses the method of life support and suppression. This is not a fallacy. A slight difference is a thousand miles away!
There are also some naming software that add a scoring system, which is even more ridiculous. The names created using the software have relatively high scores, often over 90 points. How is this score determined? In fact, it is just a marketing selling point made by software developers and has no practical significance. If you don’t believe it, try the names of certain founding fathers. The scores are pitifully low. Could it be that their names were not chosen well? When naming clients, I often encounter the problem of trusting computers to name names. It is obviously a name that is very suitable for the native and has a profound meaning. However, because the score is not high, the client questions it, so I have to explain the horoscopes to the client first. Likes and taboos, the principles, basis and methods of naming, etc.
It is really not easy to come up with a good name, and it is not something that can be done by computer software!