Perhaps it was not until Columbus discovered North America that our world gradually became prosperous. Now that we have entered the 21
Perhaps it was not until Columbus discovered North America that our world gradually became prosperous. Now that we have entered the 21st century, we humans still do not know the history of Earth's Biosphere One. , and we don’t know how our human ancestors stood upright on this planet in the first place? But what is significant is that every isolated island in the Pacific Ocean, which is almost a sea world, is always crowded with a large number of plant life and animal life. Maybe no one can clearly understand these (whether they are plants or animals) How on earth could things be so evenly distributed across this scattered and vast island? Perhaps this is a mystery, because even though those slightly obese Polynesians with arms and legs seemed to be able to venture across the ocean in canoes, those thickly furred, somewhat human-like apes or How do other animals and plants fit into that tiny canoe? If this is a mystery given by the nature of the universe to intelligent creatures on earth, then slowly learn to solve it century after century.
Natural selection, survival of the fittest. This is Charles Darwin A scientific saying that has influenced centuries came out of the inspiration. From ancient apes to apes to humans, this is the fundamental basis of Darwin's theory of evolution. However, after a long period of extensive research on paleontology, people It was found that there is a time gap of at least 500,000 years between ape man and modern man. Moreover, since many relics of prehistoric humans have been discovered in many regions of the world, if anthropologists want to The first time was in Kenya, where a skull and bones dating back more than 2.8 million years were discovered; the second time was in southern Africa. In the mines of the Border Cave (located on the border between Swaziland and Natal), it has been found that people of the modern type lived in it - about 100,000 BC; the third time was in Tanzania , some human-like teeth and jawbones were discovered. It is said that there are 375 "Lucy" skeletons, which have been determined to be nearly 4 million years old. Its discovery has filled in "the broken link in the history of evolution." . According to previous evolutionary theories, the first primate that could be called a human did not evolve into "upright man" until 1 million years ago. However, the skeletons excavated from the underground of East Rudolf Basing in Kenya , not only was it determined to be nearly 3 million years ago, but its shape was close to that of modern humans, which greatly exceeded people’s past speculation.
Although Professor Raymond Dart discovered it in Africa in 1924 An older one, however, was not discovered until the British anthropologists Louise and Mary Leakey made a rich discovery in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, and the American anthropologists Donald Johnson and Timothy White in the Afar region of Ethiopia. This hypothesis was established only after the discovery of .
In 1959, Leakey and others discovered a skull nearly 2 million years ago. It belonged to the same family as the man discovered by Dart, which shocked the entire world. In 1960, they discovered the skull and jaw of another prehistoric man, along with some chiseled stone tools that were apparently used to make weapons. They named this man "Homo Barbilis." (a person with dexterous hands).
A few years later, they found fragments of the more evolved Homo erectus, the first person confirmed to have used fire. And it was related to Java. Homo and Peking Man belong to the same species, but are 500,000 years older than the latter.
In 1975, Mary Leakey reported further discoveries about prehistoric humans in Tanzania, that is, based on radioactive detection, It was determined that they were 3.75 million years old.
In 1979, Dr. Johnson and White discovered some ancient human bones. Their heads were very small, almost the same as those of apes. The discoverers called this kind of sub-human bones The family belongs to the genus Australopithecus, which has a history of 3.6 million or 3.7 million years ago.
Subsequently in 1982, Jay Desmond Clark and Timothy White announced that it was still in Ethiopian find - fragments of a femur and a forehead bone that appear to belong to the same species
Category.
Perhaps there will be many, many primitive areas for several years that have not been discovered and touched so far. Therefore, if someone thinks that as long as one or two ancient fossils can be obtained with each new discovery, , it seems too hasty to use it to prove or determine the birthplace of ancient apes and ancient humans. Does anyone know whether it is because the leg muscles of human ancestors are particularly developed, or because The development of future generations
If we could look back in the time tunnel, perhaps the problem would be much simpler, because those realms are beyond dispute. Of course, if we can calmly and rationally imagine more problems, Then you may find that it is meaningless for Australopithecus to march north; no matter whether the origin of Australopithecus is in the Java Island of Asia or the Yuanmou area of ??Yunnan, or in Tanzania, Ethiopia or Kenya in Africa , none of these are important, the important thing is: neither modern archeology nor future archeology may be able to provide any meaningful reason for the goal of these "Australopithecus" to march in this direction, even if Just a small reason!
It is conceivable that why the ancient apes that originally lived in Java, Yunnan or Africa had to leave the south, where food was abundant and the climate was mild, and why did they trek long distances to the cold and desolate north? Why could apes millions of years ago cross Siberia and reach North America, but today's orangutans or apes never leave their own mountains? Could it be that the ape leaders in ancient times were born with the understanding that they must conquer the world?
In fact, if we really want to talk about the remains of the first ancient humans on the earth, then it is not Asia, nor is it It’s not Tanzania, Ethiopia or Kenya, but the Republic of Gabon. This green country is located in west-central Africa on the Atlantic Ocean. There is a mysterious area called “Oklo” with beautiful scenery. , a famous uranium mining area with dazzling mountains and treacherous peaks.
In June 1972, a batch of uranium ore shipped from here to France was tested by the factory and found to have serious uranium-235 content. On the low side, even as low as less than 0.3, while the content of uranium 235 in any other uranium ore is generally 0.72, the gap between them is as high as 0.42. This very strange phenomenon has attracted great attention from scientists, and they have used a variety of advanced methods to Technical means
According to research, the Oklo uranium deposit was formed about 2 billion years ago. The nuclear reactor started operating soon after the ore was formed, and the operation time was as long as 500,000 years. Faced with this The scientifically designed, structurally sound, and well-preserved nuclear reactor 2 billion years ago left scientists stunned and puzzled. Who left this nuclear reactor behind? Is it really a relic left by the previous generation of earth civilization, the "Oklo Mystery"?
According to previous reports, 2 billion years ago, perhaps there were only some algae with eukaryotic cells on the earth. It was not until the early part of the fourth century of the "Cenozoic Era" and the "Pleistocene" of the geological era (approximately more than 3 million years ago) that early apes began to appear. From then on, it was not until the end of World War II that the invention of and The first atomic bomb was used. In 1950, atomic energy was used for the first time to generate electricity in a laboratory in the desert of Idaho, USA. In 1954, the former Soviet Union built the world's first nuclear power plant. It can be seen that Two billion years ago, more than 99% of the nuclear reactors built in Oklo were definitely not built by native humans on the earth, but seemed to be from aliens.
Humans Who are the ancestors and where do humans on earth come from? Although humans have had solid footprints on our planet as early as 2 billion years ago, those alien humans who have the ability to come to the earth to mine are likely not the ancestors of humans on earth, because according to apes Fossils and blood relationships show that humans on earth and modern gorillas, chimpanzees, orangutans and gibbons are the closest ancestral relatives.
Darwin's theory of biological evolution was like a thunder, shocking the world in chaos. People. According to Darius's theory of evolution and natural selection, the origin process of human beings on earth should be:
The dinosaur giants that have ruled the earth for 140 million years, due to environmental changes, food reduction, bad weather, etc. reason
, finally suffered complete extinction 65 million years ago. After a period of time, a new round of ecological environment was formed. The new natural environment was more suitable for the survival of mammals, so as a branch of primates, About 8 million years ago, ancient apes with strong physiques evolved. After a long period of changes and adaptations, the ancient apes finally evolved into ape-men. Through living in groups and working, apes finally freed their forelimbs and formed upright walking. Slowly Thinking, language, vocabulary, symbols, etc. were produced, and in this way, humans on earth evolved step by step.
Perhaps, from a certain perspective, Darwin’s theory of evolution is indeed very convincing. Moreover, in some countries and regions, individual people with similar atavism can be found. Compared with orangutans or apes in terms of morphology, these people always have some similarities in origin. Some people even have hands and faces that look almost the same. They are not much different from orangutans. It is said that one or two were born with primitive With the progress of science and technology and the improvement of science and technology, this almost confirmed theory of evolution has finally been severely tested; because there are insurmountable gaps in several obvious characteristics between humans and orangutans, or humans and apes.
The most important watershed is skin. The biggest and most obvious difference between humans and animals is skin. Why are they both primates, but only humans have skin that is not covered by body hair? But what about the other 192 species of primates (including our close relatives, orangutans and apes), which are covered with thick body hair?
There is also hair. Even the most backward Tu people on the earth, as long as they are called human beings (whether they are Tu people or Shengfan), they generally have hair but no body hair, and they can walk upright and have their own bodies. Language. Why can't we find some evolving half-ape, half-human ape species in any primitive forest?
In terms of IQ, although orangutans and apes cannot be compared with humans, they are still much higher than dolphins, elephants, snakes and dogs. However, the question is why only in the short period of 20,000 years ago , but humans on earth can suddenly rise from the apes and branch out and develop rapidly?
Twenty thousand years, how short and sudden does this seem compared to the millions of years of anthropoid evolution?
As for the explanation of why humans have no body hair, in 1962 British anthropology professor Alice Hardy boldly proposed the hypothesis that humans originated from the sea; why primates all have thick body hair? Are humans the only ones with exposed skin like water beasts? Primates have no subcutaneous fat, but humans have thick subcutaneous fat like aquatic animals. The location of human lanugo hair is obviously different from other primates but similar to aquatic animals.
More than 20 years later, Malais, a scientist from the Atlantic Treaty Organization, proposed a new idea, believing that the ancestors of human beings were aliens. Malais believed that about 65,000 years ago, a group of aliens came to the earth, and they had They have a high degree of wisdom and technological knowledge, and found that the earth's environment is very suitable for them to live in, but they cannot bear the heavy burden of the earth's gravity, so these aliens had to give up the living environment of the earth and decided to create A new group of people suitable for life on earth and able to continue on earth at the same time, so apes with higher energy and intelligence were selected.
In this way, the first generation of human ancestors began to be born. This is the result of the combination of aliens and earth mother apes.
Perhaps the origin of human beings on earth can not only be purely indigenous, but also originate from the sea or the sky. But if we say that humans originated from In the case of the sea, the various processes that need to be explained may still be difficult, especially in terms of fossil or archaeological evidence, because this is considered the most powerful evidence to prove the human evolutionary model. If humans are said to have originated from aliens , then how should we explain the ancient human fossils discovered 300,000 to 500,000 years ago or even 1 to 4 million years ago? Moreover, as long as humans live on an earth planet in the outer solar system, they are also subject to the attraction of gravity, and the earth is not particularly huge in the solar system.
How can a large star prove that after aliens came to the earth, they would abandon the earth because they could not bear the burden of gravity?
Marais’s insights are indeed shocking. The evidence he cited is that a 550,000-year-old skull found in San Diego represents a species with intelligence that far exceeds that of today’s humans by several thousand. times, so it is speculated that "he" is one of the aliens who came to the earth in ancient times. So, on what basis did Marais judge from his skull that his intelligence was thousands of times higher than that of today's humans? He didn’t know, and he didn’t say it; but he pointed out another piece of evidence that might be the combination of aliens and apes on Earth, which is the well-known giant image on the cliff at the top of the Andes. Marais said that it was most likely an alien. A realistic depiction of the union between man and Earth ape.