Can helicobacter pylori be cured?

Why not recommend killing Helicobacter pylori?

Why not recommend killing Helicobacter pylori? Many people will find that they have bad breath. In fact, if halitosis persists, it may be caused by Helicobacter pylori, which will parasitize the human stomach, destroy the mucosa of gastric and duodenal ulcers and may lead to gastritis. So why not recommend killing Helicobacter pylori?

Why not recommend killing Helicobacter pylori 1? Generally speaking, Helicobacter pylori does not need to be killed, but if infection occurs, it needs treatment.

Judge whether to kill Helicobacter pylori infection;

(1) Normal situation:

Generally speaking, there is no need to kill Helicobacter pylori, because Helicobacter pylori is a normal flora existing in the duodenum and stomach. When the flora in the organ is in a balanced state, it will not be infected, and it is not necessary to kill it with drugs casually.

(2) Helicobacter pylori infection:

Patients infected with Helicobacter pylori need to be killed. Helicobacter pylori infection is generally caused by chronic gastritis, gastric lymphoma, oral infection, duodenitis, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer and cardiovascular damage.

Moreover, Helicobacter pylori can also cause halitosis, infection, intestinal flora imbalance, gastrointestinal bleeding and other phenomena. When the patient has the above clinical symptoms, it is necessary to kill Helicobacter pylori.

Solution:

1. After the patient is diagnosed with Helicobacter pylori infection, taking clarithromycin, metronidazole, omeprazole, cephalosporin and other drugs under the guidance of a doctor is helpful to relieve the condition.

2, patients need to pay attention to oral care, and pay attention to oral hygiene, which will inhibit Helicobacter pylori and improve the situation of oral odor.

3. During the treatment, patients should eat more fresh vegetables and fruits, and avoid spicy food. They can do appropriate outdoor activities, improve their body's resistance and promote their recovery.

Why not recommend killing Helicobacter pylori 2? Helicobacter pylori is harmful.

Helicobacter pylori may have originated in East Africa. About 50,000 to 70,000 years ago, Helicobacter pylori spread from Africa with the migration of modern humans, witnessing a large-scale migration in human history.

By understanding this period of history, we can know that Helicobacter pylori did not appear only in modern times, but accompanied by human survival and development for tens of thousands of years. Then we naturally began to think about a question, whether the flora that has been randomly removed with us for so many years will cause other adverse reactions in the body? Is it really harmful to your health?

At present, researchers have begun to pay attention to this research and made initial progress: some studies have reported the process of eradicating Helicobacter pylori with oral drugs (mainly proton pump inhibitors, such as omeprazole, etc.). ) may cause gastrointestinal flora disorder, lead to an increase in other pathogenic bacteria, and increase the risk of intestinal infection.

At the same time, the research on whether it is beneficial in human body is also in full swing.

Helicobacter pylori can reduce the incidence of asthma and reflux esophagitis.

According to various studies, researchers have confirmed that not all Helicobacter pylori is harmful to human body. In addition to some negative effects of clearance, Helicobacter pylori itself may also be a protective factor for the body to resist certain diseases.

Tongji hospital Wang Qiang, affiliated hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, summarized the mechanism of Helicobacter pylori in preventing asthma in an article published on 20 12, and put forward the viewpoint that Helicobacter pylori plays an active role in preventing asthma in children by reading a large number of Chinese and foreign literatures.

Th- 1 and Th-2 are involved in the process of human asthma attack. We can simply understand that Th- 1 can inhibit asthma attacks, while Th-2 is the opposite. In the process of human infection with Helicobacter pylori, we can strengthen the function of Th- 1 cells through a series of complex reactions, and at the same time inhibit Th-2 cells that promote asthma attack, thus protecting the body.

The results show that infection with Helicobacter pylori can effectively inhibit the occurrence of asthma and other allergic diseases in young people, and there are published meta-analyses to support this view.

Some scholars have studied the relationship between Helicobacter pylori and reflux esophagitis, and made a retrospective analysis of 374 patients admitted in 1 year.

It was found that the recurrence rate of patients with reflux esophagitis infected by Helicobacter pylori after cure was significantly lower than that of patients with negative Helicobacter pylori, and the recurrence time was significantly longer than that of the latter. Therefore, the author thinks that Helicobacter pylori is a protective factor of reflux esophagitis.

Some foreign scholars have done similar research and the conclusions are basically the same. According to the analysis, the main reason is that urease secreted by Helicobacter pylori changes the pH value in the stomach while antagonizing the relaxation of esophageal sphincter, avoiding the harm of gastric acid reflux to the lower esophagus and preventing the attack and recurrence of reflux esophagitis.

Not only have some of the above benefits, but also Helicobacter pylori has a positive effect on preventing childhood obesity. Therefore, whether Helicobacter pylori should be eradicated indiscriminately has always been controversial in academic circles.

The timing of eradication of Helicobacter pylori is very important.

Although Helicobacter pylori seems to have some benefits to human beings, the relevant conclusions still need to be improved through further research. It is known in academic circles, or after a lot of research and literature argumentation, that Helicobacter pylori is a carcinogen, and eradication of Helicobacter pylori has a positive effect on preventing gastric cancer.

Professor Sugano, an authoritative professor in the industry, pointed out that eradicating Hp can reduce the risk of gastric cancer by 54%, and about 4.3% (480/149) of the control group without eradicating Hp developed gastric cancer in 2005.

Professor Liu Wenzhong from Renji Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine also mentioned that compared with the negative effects after eradication, people at high risk of gastric cancer should obviously eradicate Helicobacter pylori more actively and thoroughly.

The incidence of gastric cancer is the result of many factors. A large number of studies have confirmed that Helicobacter pylori has a high probability of causing cancer in people with family history of gastric cancer or gastropathy (especially atrophic gastritis or gastric ulcer), and if it is not eradicated, it will cause endless problems. Therefore, experts do not advocate the indiscriminate eradication of Helicobacter pylori, but for high-risk groups, it is recommended to actively deal with it according to doctor's advice.

The research on Helicobacter pylori is still in progress, and many conclusions actually need more data to support, but at least through the current research, we know that Helicobacter pylori is not harmful or beneficial, so we should grasp the opportunity and conditions more carefully when eradicating it.

Why is it not recommended to kill Helicobacter pylori 3 1? Can people infected with Helicobacter pylori get rectal cancer?

The chances are not high.

Helicobacter pylori infection is indeed a key risk source for rectal cancer. As early as 1996, it was listed as a first-class carcinogen by the International Organization for Scientific Research on Cancer (IARC), and the risk determination of carcinogens was accurate. The data show that the probability of lifelong rectal cancer of Helicobacter pylori carriers is 1~5 times that of non-carriers.

Naturally, the real occurrence of rectal cancer is not only caused by Helicobacter pylori infection, but also influenced by other factors, natural environment and other factors. According to IARC estimation, 36% and 47% of all rectal cancer patients in capitalist countries and developed countries are caused only by Helicobacter pylori infection, and most of the rest are only involved.

Rectal cancer is basically related to Helicobacter pylori, that is, Helicobacter pylori infection is equivalent to rectal cancer?

No, the risk of rectal cancer does not mean that there will be a result of rectal cancer.

Rectal cancer can be divided into distal rectal cancer (stomach body and stomach body), proximal rectal cancer and rectal cancer at the junction of stomach and esophagus. There are also histological differences between intestinal rectal cancer and diffuse rectal cancer. Their correlation with Helicobacter pylori infection is different. Different strains of Helicobacter pylori will also cause different results.

In addition, the key point is that rectal cancer caused by Helicobacter pylori generally has a long progressive transformation process. Even if the first two steps are removed, a person's life may not change for such a long time.

The end result is that only a very small number of Helicobacter pylori carriers will eventually become rectal cancer. Although the number of people who died of rectal cancer in China in 20 16 was as high as 500 thousand, it only accounted for 5% of the total number of deaths, which was far from the prevalence rate of Helicobacter pylori.

In other words, the vast majority of Helicobacter pylori carriers did not die of rectal cancer. In China, the probability of lifelong rectal cancer of Helicobacter pylori carriers is estimated to be about 1.8%, and most people are still safe.

2. Will complete eradication of Helicobacter pylori reduce the risk of rectal cancer?

That's true. Some people may think subjectively that the treatment of carcinogens will definitely reduce the occurrence of cancer. But this is not the case. Once some risk sources appear, they will not reduce the risk because they are removed again.

After getting the answer to the first puzzle, the medical community has been waiting for the result of the second puzzle. Until recently, with the release of various meta-analyses related to scientific research, there is evidence that Helicobacter pylori can be treated and the risk of rectal cancer can be reduced.

Data information shows that whether it is high-risk or low-risk rectal cancer, asymptomatic carriers or patients with early cancer confirmed by endoscopic surgery, thorough eradication of Helicobacter pylori will reduce the incidence of gastric cancer afterwards. The overall proportion of this reduction is about 34%.