What has been "dealt with" by the author of the thesis praising the tutor and the teacher's mother?

Today's society is regarded as a human society by many people. As long as you are popular, nothing is impossible. This is the mentality of many people now. Although in many things, human feelings are really important, but in academic issues, human feelings can not replace real talent and practical learning. In serious matters, it is not advisable to achieve success through human relations and flattery. In academic matters, we still have to rely on our own talents to achieve our goals. Praise the tutor and the author of the teacher's mother's paper, because there are many false information in the paper, he was punished. And cancel the project, recover the funds, and prohibit him from applying for the project within two years. Next, let's take a look at boasting about what the tutor and the author of the teacher's paper have handled.

First, two papers caused an uproar. At the beginning of 2020, two papers published in the Chinese core journal Glacier and Frozen Soil caused a heated discussion on the Internet. There are a lot of false information in the paper, which can cause hot discussion among netizens because these two papers describe the author's tutor and teacher's mother in a large space, and render and praise them. Netizens all said that it was the first time to kiss up with a paper.

2. Praise your tutor and the teacher's mother for project funds in the paper. These two papers, published in the Chinese core journal Glacier and Frozen Soil, provided convenience for the author's project application, and finally got 2 million funds. From this point of view, it is a success to praise his tutor and teacher's mother, but it also makes him swallow the consequences.

Thirdly, because the false information in the paper was finally dealt with, after two papers published in the core Chinese journal Glacier and Frozen Soil caused heated discussion, the state took this matter seriously. After verification, there were a lot of false information in the paper, so the state cancelled the project, recovered 2 million funds, and dealt with the author quickly.