Introduction: Because there are many performance appraisal methods, different appraisal methods determine different performance management systems. I will share the sorted performance appraisal methods with you. Welcome to read!
First, the relative evaluation method
Relative evaluation method is to determine a benchmark in a group, compare the individuals in the group with the benchmark, and then evaluate their relative position in the group. The evaluation with standard score actually shows the position of the inspected object in the whole, so this evaluation is a relative evaluation. For example, the evaluation of the school's unified examination results is usually based on the average level of the unified examination in the city (county) where the school is located, and the status of the school's achievements in a city (county) is judged. Advantages:
Strong adaptability and wide application, no matter what the situation of this group is, it can be compared to judge the relative position of individuals in the group;
Use the evaluation standard based on the evaluation object group to find their individual differences, so as to make a more objective, fair and accurate judgment on the evaluated individuals;
It is beneficial to stimulate the competitive consciousness of the evaluation object.
Disadvantages:
The outstanding people who are selected are not necessarily high-level and high-quality, and those who are not selected are not necessarily low-level and low-quality, so it is easy to lower the objective standards;
The evaluation results only reflect the relative position of the evaluation object within a certain range, not necessarily their actual level;
It is easy to ignore the completion of educational goals;
It is easy to lead to fierce and endless competition and dampen the enthusiasm of some people.
Specific way:
(1) sequence comparison method
Sequential comparison method is a method to rank and evaluate employee performance. Before the evaluation, we must first determine the evaluation module, but we are not sure about the working standards to be achieved. All employees in the same position are compared in the same evaluation module. According to their working conditions, those with good jobs rank first and those with poor jobs rank last. Finally, add up the ranking figures of several modules of each employee, which is the assessment result of the employee. The smaller the total, the better the performance appraisal results.
(2) Relative comparison method
The relative comparison method is to compare employees with each other, and any two employees make a comparison. Comparing two employees, which employee's record is better? 1? Do you remember the poor employees? 0? . After all the employees compare with each other, add up everyone's scores. The higher the total score, the better the performance appraisal results.
(3) Forced proportional method
Compulsory proportion method refers to the method of classifying candidates into several categories (best, better, medium, poor and worst) according to their performance.
Second, the absolute evaluation method
Absolute evaluation method is to determine a standard outside the evaluation object set, and compare the evaluation object with the objective standard to determine the absolute position of the evaluation object to reach the target benchmark. For example, the standard of teaching evaluation is generally teaching plan and syllabus, and the specific evaluation indicators established from it.
Advantages: Its criteria are objective. If the evaluation is accurate, then after the evaluation, each appraisee can be clear about the gap between himself and the objective standard, which is conducive to carrying forward the advantages and overcoming the disadvantages. At the same time, the use of absolute evaluation method can directly identify the completion of various educational goals and clarify the focus of future work.
Disadvantages: its objective criteria are difficult to be objective, and it is easy to be influenced by the evaluator's educational value orientation and experience when formulating and mastering evaluation criteria. Due to the lack of horizontal comparison, the evaluation object is easy to satisfy itself, which is not conducive to the formation of competitive atmosphere. In the implementation of absolute evaluation, specific standards are not easy to be recognized and grasped, or are influenced by human factors. In practical application, they are often used together with other evaluation methods.
Specific way:
(1) management by objectives
Management by objectives is a performance appraisal method that decomposes the overall objectives of an organization into individual objectives step by step, and finally evaluates the performance according to the completion of the work objectives by the assessed. Before the work begins, the appraiser and the appraisee should reach an agreement on the content, time limit and evaluation standard of the work to be completed. At the end of the period, the appraiser will make an appraisal according to the appraiser's work and the original appraisal standard.
(2) Key Performance Indicator Method
Based on the annual target of the enterprise, the key performance indicator method determines the key quantitative indicators reflecting the comprehensive performance of enterprises, departments and employees in a certain period by analyzing the performance characteristics of employees, and conducts performance appraisal on this basis.
(3) Grade evaluation method
According to the job analysis, the grading method divides the job content of the evaluated post into several independent modules, and in each module, the work standards required to complete the work of the module are described in clear language. At the same time, the standard is divided into several grade options, such as? Excellent, good, qualified and unqualified? By analogy, the appraiser evaluates the completion of each module according to the appraiser's actual work performance. The total score is the employee's assessment score.
(4) Balanced Scorecard
The balanced scorecard evaluates the enterprise from four angles: finance, customers, internal business processes, learning and growth, and gives different weights to each index according to the strategic requirements, so as to realize the comprehensive evaluation of the enterprise, enable managers to grasp and control the enterprise as a whole, and finally realize the strategic objectives of the enterprise.
Third, the description method
Descriptive methods can describe or assume the changes of related factors of enterprise organization in a certain period in the future. Predict and plan the future demand of human resources from description, hypothesis, analysis and synthesis. But this method is difficult to make long-term prediction, because the longer the time span, the more difficult it is to describe and assume various uncertain factors of environmental change. The first stage of descriptive method is to carefully select standard work. The first step is to divide the work into 5~6 basic factors by scoring method, and then decompose these factors into sub-factors one by one, as shown in the following table:
In order to evaluate each position conveniently, the method divides these factors into four grades (average, good, excellent and excellent). The evaluation team scored all the standard jobs according to these four grades, which is equivalent to describing each job. This provides a preliminary level of standard work. Through this process, the definitions of factors and grades are gradually determined. Then, give weight to the evaluation factors. For the first time, the paired comparison method was used to arrange posts to complete this kind of work. In a sense, this method is a simplification of the scoring method of determining quantity by ratio comparison.
Features: The main feature of the description method is to score with simple factors, emphasizing the importance of full participation of employee representatives at each stage, which greatly mobilized the enthusiasm and participation consciousness of employees.
Specific way:
(1) all-angle evaluation method
All-angle evaluation method (360? Assessment method), that is, an assessment method for superiors, colleagues, subordinates, themselves and customers. Through this multi-dimensional evaluation, combined with the opinions of different evaluators, a comprehensive and fair evaluation can be obtained.
(2) Important event method
Important events mean that the appraisers usually pay attention to collecting the appraisers? Important event? Here? Important event? It refers to those events that will have a positive or negative impact on the overall performance of the department. These performances should be recorded in writing, and according to these written records, the assessment results will be finally formed.
Quantitative performance management method is to scientifically process data, timely and accurately assess and coordinate the implementation of income, ability and distribution relations in different periods and under different working conditions.
Fourth, the target performance appraisal method
Target performance appraisal is a process of decomposing the overall goal and implementing the responsibility from top to bottom. Accordingly, performance appraisal should also be subject to the completion of the overall goal and sub-goals. Therefore, as the KPI assessment of departments and positions, we should also start from the standpoint that departments support the whole company and employees support departments. At the same time, the leaders of companies and departments should also be responsible for the performance appraisal of their subordinates, and they should not shirk their responsibilities to their subordinates. Performance appraisal distinguishes between departmental assessment indicators and individual assessment indicators, and can also ensure that superiors can actively care for and guide subordinates to complete tasks from the mechanism.
SMART principle of evaluation index
S: (concrete) be clear and specific, and the indicators should be clear and clear, so that the evaluator and the evaluated can accurately understand the objectives;
M: (measurable) quantifiable. An enterprise should quantify the boss, enterprise and organizational structure. Goals and assessment indicators should be quantified, and the words "relatively good" and "not bad" cannot be quantified, which will lead to the ambiguity of standards and must be digitized. Without numerical indicators, it is impossible to assess at will, and it is easy to make mistakes when assessing; A: (achievable) achievable, goals and assessment indicators must be achieved through hard work, neither too high nor too low. For example, the sales manager's assessment showed that the sales revenue last year was 20 million, and the demand this year was 65.438+0.5 billion, and no support was given. This is an indicator that is completely out of reach. The target value of indicators should be set according to personal situation, post situation and past history;
R: (Related) Seeking truth from facts, not assuming. The definition of reality is having existing resources, which is objective and true;
T: There is a time limit. Goals and indicators should be time-limited, and should be completed within the specified time. We'll see the result then. If you ask for 20 million sales, it is meaningless to ask for it. It is meaningful to know how long it will take to complete the sales of 20 million yuan.
;