Evolutionary theory says that people evolved from apes, Catholicism and Christianity say that people were created by God, Buddhist scriptures say that people descended from the sky, people who believe in flying saucers say that people on earth were transformed by aliens, and some people say that people on earth were raised by aliens as soon as possible. Is that so? Or is it all wrong?
First, follow in Darwin's footsteps.
1835, biologist Darwin came to the Galapagos Islands and saw that most of the creatures on each island, whether birds, lizards, elephants or turtles, were the same, but there were some small differences. Darwin was puzzled and began to think, so he thought that the biological differences on the islands were caused by the different foraging environments. After returning to China, he put forward the hypothesis of "the origin of species", which influenced the biology field 100 years.
One hundred and fifty-two years later, from the end of March to the beginning of April in 1987, Mr. Pan Jian Hong and I came to the Galapagos Islands. Perhaps this is the record of people from Taiwan Province Province landing on this island for the first time. During the five-day trip, I experienced such a long fishing boat life for the first time in my life. I threw up all over my stomach, like a crumpled plastic bag. I also experienced the taste of being grilled by the scorching sun on the island in the middle of the Pacific Ocean just below the equator. After our legs were burned by the blazing sun, we couldn't wear pants because they felt extremely painful.
Here, I observe all kinds of local creatures and think about Darwin's thoughts. The same observation leads to different conclusions. Darwin thought that the original finches were all the same. Now, some islands have bigger and shorter beaks, while others have longer and sharper beaks. It is precisely because they peck at different seeds and plants that their beaks change slowly from generation to generation, and so do today's finches. In this process, finches that cannot adapt to the environment and remain unchanged will not survive. This is "natural selection" and "survival of the fittest", but I have also observed it, but I have doubts. If it is true according to the theory of evolution, then giraffes have to stretch their necks to eat high leaves because the short grass has been eaten up, so their necks are getting longer and longer. But the longer the giraffe's neck, the more inconvenient it is to bow down to the river to drink water. They must spread their feet like a figure of eight to reduce their height so that their necks can touch the water. This dangerous posture makes people uncomfortable and vulnerable to animal attacks, so giraffes can also be extinct because of their long necks, but they can survive because of their short necks. After following in Darwin's footsteps, I deeply feel that his views are completely wrong. This one-sided view was regarded as "biological imperial edict" by later biologists without strict scientific test. I really don't know how to describe those scientists who believe in evolution. Since then, I have more confirmed the fallacy of evolution, so I firmly believe that people on earth did not evolve from apes!
Second, why do you believe in evolution?
Supporters of the theory of evolution say that higher animals evolved from lower animals, and all the relationships in the biological world are like a big tree, born of the same origin. Lower organisms are like roots, and higher species are like branches. In this way, evolution is continuous and gradually improved. This is a famous "evolutionary tree" in biology. If this is the case, from a simple lower organism to another complex higher organism, there must be countless generations of organisms with different shapes and slight differences. But so far, archaeology has not found such a discovery, and all kinds of creatures are "self-contained" and no intermediate creatures can be found.
The theory of evolution says that the process of animal evolution is as follows: primitive single-celled microorganisms, multicellular microorganisms, lower organisms in the ocean, crustaceans, fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals, primates, apes and humans. Archaeology has never found a creature between the two categories, so how did it evolve from one category to a higher category? Archaeology says these are "lost links", but there is no such connection at all, so it can't be found in the earth's crust. Originally, all kinds existed separately.
Evolutionary theory also believes that the genes of organisms are basically fixed, but occasionally mutate, which will produce individuals slightly different from the previous generation, and this characteristic can be passed on to the next generation, so the difference from generation to generation will become bigger and bigger, so mutation is the evidence of evolutionary theory. However, according to statistics, more than 99% of mutations are abnormal, harmful, defective, and even fatal, not beneficial, appropriate, and positive changes, and individuals after mutations often do not live long in the natural environment, so biological mutations are only a few, not many, and mutations are degradation rather than evolution. There are mutations in organisms, but only changes in size and color, and its basic structure remains unchanged. For example, snakes can be turned into snow-white snakes, fruit flies can be turned into big fruit flies, and turtles can be turned into armored turtles ... However, no matter how they mutate, these creatures are still their original "species" and will not become "superior" to other species. It can be seen that the idea of mutation is self-deception
Natural selection, natural selection and survival of the fittest is the golden rule of evolution, but it cannot explain many creatures in nature that have not been eliminated or evolved for hundreds of millions of years, such as platypus, rabbits, kangaroos, lungfish, whales, ... too many, cockroaches in every household have survived on the earth for 500 million years, much longer than humans. Why don't they evolve? They are useless, why not be eliminated by nature?
Dragons have roamed the earth for hundreds of millions of years. They did not go extinct because they violated the theory of natural selection, natural selection and survival of the fittest. If the earth had not been hit by other planets, dinosaurs would still be wandering on the earth today. Louis Agassiz, a professor of zoology at Harvard University, was an outstanding biologist in the last century. He said: "Darwin and his followers didn't give us any new knowledge about the origin of animals ... The theory of evolution actually conflicts with the burial and distribution of animals in the crustal rocks ... Higher fish comes first,